This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

StormCAD invert elevations are changing

Hello, I am using StormCAD within OpenRoads.  I am working on creating an existing model and some of the depths are less than ideal (not at minimums currently required).  The problem I am experiencing is when I set the invert elevation sometimes the invert elevation automatically changes to an apparent minimum depth.   I have looked in the catalog that I am using and cannot see a minimum depth.  What property/where can I change so that I can set the inverts as they currently are?  

Parents
  • Hello Damien,

    What are the settings for the conduit properties "Set Invert to Start" and "Set Invert to Stop"? If these are set to True and you change the invert elevation on the manhole or catch basin the conduit is connected to, the conduit start and stop invert elevation will change as well. If you do not want to use the same invert elevation for the conduit as the end node, set these fields to False and you will be able to set the invert elevation manually. 

    Otherwise, if you are modeling a Design run in StormCAD, the invert elevations can change depending on the design settings. If you run an Analysis calculation, the invert elevations will not change.

    If this doesn't help, more details about what data is changing and when it is changing may be needed.

    Regards,

    Scott

  • Hi Scott,

    Thanks for following up.  I have set design options for structures and pipe inverts to false.  I am trying to run an analysis model as its an existing conditions model. When I type in the surveyed invert (612.27) in the highlighted field below, it automatically changes to 611.44.  I have tried setting "Set Rim to Ground Elevation?" to false as well but that doesn't change the behavior.  I suspect it has something to do with a rule regarding the inlet in the inlet catalog; however, when I reviewed the catalog I could not find a parameter for minimum depth. 

    Cheers,
    Damien 

      

  • Thanks for testing that. It appears to be an issue (or perhaps working as designed, somehow) with OpenRoads Designer, which is handled by our Civil team via the OpenRoads forum. I am going to contact a few of my colleagues from that team to assist with this. Thank you for your patience.

    In the meantime, are you able to share the DGN file (see link in previous reply) in case the problem is project-specific?


    Regards,

    Jesse Dringoli
    Technical Support Manager, OpenFlows
    Bentley Communities Site Administrator
    Bentley Systems, Inc.

  • Thank you Jesse!  I have uploaded the file using the confidential method.  I look forward to learning more about this issue and how to resolve it.

  • Thanks, I see it. Are there are particular steps to reproduce that would help our Civil team diagnose this?


    Regards,

    Jesse Dringoli
    Technical Support Manager, OpenFlows
    Bentley Communities Site Administrator
    Bentley Systems, Inc.

  • I just change the invert of C-5.1.1 to anything above 611.44 and it changes back to 611.44. There are a few others with similar issue but I assume resolve one I will be able to resolve all using same methodology.

  • Thanks, I've passed this information along.


    Regards,

    Jesse Dringoli
    Technical Support Manager, OpenFlows
    Bentley Communities Site Administrator
    Bentley Systems, Inc.

Reply Children
  • The structure is placed as a 3D cell consisting of a 3D Top Cell and a 3D Bottom Cell.  The 3D Top cell has a point in it that represents the top or ground elevation (Construction Class point, Linestyle 5) and there is also a point in the 3D Bottom cell that represents the invert elevation (Construction Class Point, Linestyle 5).  The vertical distance between those two points is the minimum depth that the structure can have.  If you try to move the invert to a shallower depth it will go back to that minimum.  Typically the 3D cells will be created where those two point locations will have a vertical distance of 1 foot or so.  Having a structure of this type less than 1 foot in depth is not very likely so that way users would not run into this very often. 

    In this case the minimum or vertical distance between those two point is most likely 2.625 feet.  But to be sure we would need access the 3D cell in the library, find those two points and measure the distance between them.

    Here is a link to the help section on this.

    https://docs.bentley.com/LiveContent/web/Drainage%20and%20Utilities%20CONNECT%20Edition%20Help-v3/en/GUID-5538CEA4-D3C1-462A-9EC0-978CCE75BCE3.html


    For more information about the Road and Site design tools, visit the Road and Site design WIKI at: http://communities.bentley.com/products/road___site_design/w/road_and_site_design__wiki

    Answer Verified By: Jesse Dringoli 

  • Ok, thank you for this explanation.  I'm almost certain this is the issue.  I imagine that this is due to the cells coming from the DOT library and being set to minimum design depths.  So, either I need use a default inlet that uses another cell or copy this predefined cell and link it to a copy of the inlet feature definition?  I really want to keep everything in ORD.