When I run my contour map my model is showing negative pressure at the water plant.
WaterGems
Hello Andrea,
Do you have a junction near the "water plant" that has an elevation set too high? Take a look at a profile of the area to help visualize the hydraulic grade versus elevation. Negative pressure will occur when the hydraulic grade is below the physical elevation. See more here: Troubleshooting negative pressures at pumps, junctions, & other node elements
If this does not help, please provide a copy of the model for review along with a screenshot of what you are seeing: Sharing Hydraulic Model Files on the OpenFlows Forum
Regards,
Jesse DringoliTechnical Support Manager, OpenFlowsBentley Communities Site AdministratorBentley Systems, Inc.
MUD 36AA.wtgpkg.wtgpkg.zip
There's my file please let me know if it works for you.
Can you clarify what you mean by "running through"? Are you encountering a specific problem? Please clarify the steps to reproduce and clarify what you are seeing.
If you are referring to the scenario named "Peak Demand", I took a general look at the demands:
Yes, that does represent a fire is there a better way of doing that -- that won't mess with the rest of my scenarios? I could not get my fire flow alterative to work.
Hi Andrea, the best approach may depend on what you need the model to tell you about your fire.
Do you need to see what the instantaneous pressures are in the system when 1200 gpm is flowing at a hydrant nearby that junction? If so, you could run a steady state simulation (instead of the current EPS) with that fixed demand added to that node. To ensure that the 1200 gpm demand does not appear in other non-fire scenarios, you would need to ensure that they use separate Demand alternatives.
If you need to assess the impact the fire has on your tanks, you may need to run an EPS like you have it now, but configure a pattern so that the fire only lasts for a certain period of time. This is what the article I mentioned in my previous reply explains: Running a fire flow analysis in EPS (Extended Period Simulation)
If you need to assess exactly how much fire flow is available at one or more hydrant locations based on constraints like minimum residual and minimum zone pressure, you would use the automated fireflow feature. In this case you would model the junction demands as the normal demands (remove the 1200 gpm fixed demand) and use the Fireflow alternative instead of a new Demand alternative. You mentioned that you could not get your fire flow alternative to work - if you attempted to use automated fireflow and encountered a problem, please review the information in the following article and if it does not help, provide more details: Understanding Automated Fire Flow Results
Okay am looking to set up for an instantaneous pressure. How would I find the pressure at that node with a greater demand?
To see the pressure when the "fire" happens, look at the "Results" section of the properties of the junction after computing a steady state simulation with the fire demand added to the node. You can also use the hydrant flow curve option to see a range of demand and resulting residual pressure (remove the 1200 gpm demand from the node first).
My max day demand scenario is now showing negative pressure at the water plant. Max day should have a multiplier of 1.3. This is shown the best on the contour map where you can see the negative numbers in the legend. Does this sound correct?
Andrea, is this a new model revision? Is the negative pressure on a pump suction side? Is the elevation value correct? Try creating a profile of the area to see the hydraulic grade with respect to the elevations.
Generally speaking increased demands result in increased headloss which results in lower pressure. if this is a scenario has a demand multiplier resulting in higher demands than the other scenarios, then lower pressure may be expected.
The following article has further guidance on troubleshooting negative pressure: Troubleshooting negative pressures at pumps, junctions, & other node elements
If this does not help, please provide a copy of the updated model.
MUD 36AAAA.wtgpkg.wtgpkg.zip
This is the new model.
I do see the 1.3 multiplier for the "Max Day Scenario" but none of your demands have a pattern assigned which suggests this should be steady state instead of EPS.
I am also not seeing any user notification about negative pressure in that scenario and the minimum pressure result field is positive for all junctions and pumps.