For pipes at angle points (horizontally) or slope changes (vertically) , should I treat those locations as "transition" or"cross section" or it doesn't matter when you run the system?
Hi Nigel,
From element point of view, you have little more options to enter in a manhole Vs a transition. From the hydraulics point both will calculate the headloss. Now, cross-section is a different element generally it represents the geometry of a channel/gutter.
But, when it doubt, match the system out!So, however system is built, try to model the same way. If you find a manhole in real system, place a manhole.
Here's a quick comparison of Manhole and Transition:
HTH,
Answer Verified By: Scott Kampa
If you are simply trying to model a bend in the pipe where the slope changes, you could indeed use the transition node. This is like the manhole, but is enclosed (whereas the manhole has a structure that extends vertically) .
To explain a bit more, the below Support Solution has been logged:
communities.bentley.com/.../12703.cross-section-vs-transition-for-modeling-slope-or-size-change.aspx
Regards,
Jesse DringoliTechnical Support Manager, OpenFlowsBentley Communities Site AdministratorBentley Systems, Inc.