Can someone explain the benefits of using logical names for reference files if you ARE NOT going to use logical names to post process your plots? This is the only benefit to using logical names that I could find and was curious if anyone uses them for any other purpose.
Thanks!
Hi Marc, How about the following: - when you have the same file attached more than once (different views/blow-ups of details etc), the only way to be able to identify them is by using (meaningful) logical names. - when you are not using the Reference Manager dialog, but instead are using key-ins/macros to manipulate reference files, the use of short logical names will make it so much easier to identify which reference file the manipulation should be applied to. hth Henk
I Hope This Helps Someone Reading This! (Intergraph>PseudoStation>MicroStation user since 1980's)
In shared network or drawing office where others may use your files it makes good sense to document your use of ref files, especially for things that need updating and issuing to clients regularly by any member of your team or company ...
Its just good drafting practice to document everything and using logical names makes it very easy..
You may also forget how a drawing was / is constructed as you might only have certain levels on out of a whole lot of other levels... say a cadastral file might have council or municipal boundaries in it as well as loads of other data but you might only want the municipal boundaries and their names so if you turn off all the other levels
hence your ref file name is X:\mapdata\cadastral zone 55.dgn
but your logical name is Municipal_Boundary this makes it easy for others to analyse you drawing too... 12 months from now you might forget how you built some complex drawing with 10 or 20 ref files and 5 or more levels used and nesting too!
Lorys
Started msnt work 1990 - Retired Nov 2022 ( oh boy am I old )
But was long time user V8iss10 (8.11.09.919) dabbler CE update 16 (10.16.00.80)
MicroStation user since 1990 Melbourne Australia.click link to PM me