New Ribbon interface, what do you think?

Hi people.

Was talking about the Connect interface with and old work mate from previous office.
Looks like both agree. Ribbon interface is a catastrophic decision.

Personally, I've really felt disconnected with Bentley's vision on how MS should evolve, I love MS, SS3 is like a Ferrari tunned for race so don´t think I'm here for Autodesk fanboyism.


I got into MS after Acad swtiched to Ribbon. I loved Bentley systems because its unique approach to engineering soft with supper serious and practical interfaces, super powerfull design environment, great 3d modelling tool, the keyboard shorcuts that allow you to super quickly change tools etc...


I could not believe Bentley would EVER switch to  Ribbon. I'm so dissapointed. What do you people think? you like it?.

Parents
  • An absolute disappointment. I have been working with Microstation for more than 30 years and defending it against AutoCAD. Is it time to change software? I can not waste time finding out how tools have been placed now, my clients can not afford it. Who has decided which is my workflow, some Microsoft worker? A big BENTLEY mistake. By the way, I still use the "MAIN CLASSIC" menu. All utilities in one, small and accessible menu. Goodbye to comfort.

  • After five days of use ...

    In my opinion, this new interface needs to improve a lot to be really competitive.

    I have worked with this CAD from the first Intergraph stations to this new version of CONNECT. I have programmed from the old "user command" to MDL and VBA. All the improvements have seemed very interesting, because they provided speed of work. But ... honestly ... I think it's obvious that ribbons take up more screen space (bad), that its operation is slower (bad) and ungroup functions that were previously joined (mmhhh ..bad)… Wink


    The complexity to customize it has seemed to me the same as always ".dgnlib". Here I found no differences. The bad thing is that apart from the facelift, I have not found any improvements (speed, compatibility, new functions?). Behind is the same program as always, but with the complication of having to train skilled workers to a new interface. It would seem a good idea to have an option (preconfigured, not to waste more time) that would allow a more classic Access (For now, faster than the current "ribbons"). Once we finish the deliveries requested by our customers, we will have time to learn new tricks to handle the same program as always.


    Perhaps they have been hasty in producing a product that does not seem well finished. I insist, it's just my personal opinion. I trust, no doubt, in an improved update that corrects many of these errors.
    With regards

Reply
  • After five days of use ...

    In my opinion, this new interface needs to improve a lot to be really competitive.

    I have worked with this CAD from the first Intergraph stations to this new version of CONNECT. I have programmed from the old "user command" to MDL and VBA. All the improvements have seemed very interesting, because they provided speed of work. But ... honestly ... I think it's obvious that ribbons take up more screen space (bad), that its operation is slower (bad) and ungroup functions that were previously joined (mmhhh ..bad)… Wink


    The complexity to customize it has seemed to me the same as always ".dgnlib". Here I found no differences. The bad thing is that apart from the facelift, I have not found any improvements (speed, compatibility, new functions?). Behind is the same program as always, but with the complication of having to train skilled workers to a new interface. It would seem a good idea to have an option (preconfigured, not to waste more time) that would allow a more classic Access (For now, faster than the current "ribbons"). Once we finish the deliveries requested by our customers, we will have time to learn new tricks to handle the same program as always.


    Perhaps they have been hasty in producing a product that does not seem well finished. I insist, it's just my personal opinion. I trust, no doubt, in an improved update that corrects many of these errors.
    With regards

Children