Since latest updates on Windows 10, the control of Display Performance goes through Windows settings and not through Nvidia Control Panel, however we got following looking:
Previosly can be improved through Nvidia Control panel but now we get the following message:
I made changes on the system but still no improvements:
My system is as it follows:
Device name ####-CAD08Full device name ####-CAD08.####.localProcessor Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7820HQ CPU @ 2.90GHz 2.90 GHzInstalled RAM 8.00 GB (7.81 GB usable)Device ID 69D03E49-5308-402D-9956-###Product ID #####-50014-69837-AAOEMSystem type 64-bit operating system, x64-based processorPen and touch No pen or touch input is available for this display
Edition Windows 10 ProVersion 21H1Installed on 15.12.2020OS build 19043.1110Experience Windows Feature Experience Pack 120.2212.3530.0
NVIDIA System Information report created on: 07/31/2021 10:58:09System name: ######-##-CAD08
[Display]Operating System: Windows 10 Pro, 64-bitDirectX version: 12.0 GPU processor: Quadro M2200Driver version: 462.30Driver Type: StandardDirect3D feature level: 12_1CUDA Cores: 1024 Core clock: 694 MHz Memory data rate: 5.51 GbpsMemory interface: 128-bit Memory bandwidth: 88.13 GB/sTotal available graphics memory: 8093 MBDedicated video memory: 4096 MB GDDR5System video memory: 0 MBShared system memory: 3997 MBVideo BIOS version: 84.06.7D.00.03IRQ: Not usedBus: PCI Express x16 Gen3Device Id: 10DE 1436 224D17AAPart Number: 2704 0000
There is something that can be done to improve the performance?
We are using on our office for Certain customer MicroStation V8i (SELECTseries 10) 08.11.09.916 and up to now we will need to be using for some time more.
USB-C charging can provide only up to around 100W of power while power adapter for Laptop is somewhere around 180W.
MSI GS75 with RTX 2060 for example in Contextcapture gets benchmark score only 22 when on USB-C charging and around 160 score when using real power adapter. 5x times difference. Try without dock.
There is stupid implementation of USB-C charging even if battery is full it doesn't allow to run it on battery power for demanding tasks so performance is limited.
Hi,
thanks for the details.
diablo_666_2 said:As I mentioned early, me and my co-workers have this issue since the last update on Windows 10
I read you original question and (maybe because I am not native speaker, so "lost in translation") that from the last Windows Update, the graphic card control was changed to Windows, not that the problem with MicroStation begun.
diablo_666_2 said:I retrieve this for GLSTATS so far:
It's not complete!
When you open 3D DGN, more information should be displayed in the statics. Most of them are system information, but a few of them can be valuable to know.
diablo_666_2 said: Also maybe is interesting to consider as well the following:
In general, laptop can never be as good as workstation, because both processor and graphics card are limited (unless "workstation laptop" machine is used). When talking about MicroStation performance, form "normal notebooks" the best would be some gaming, preferably in combination AMD processor (because current models are substantially better than anything from Intel) and AMD graphics card (because providing better DirectX performance, which is what MicroStation uses).
diablo_666_2 said:however I'm using regular USB 3.0 cable and the connector on the mobile is USB-C, how this should be impacted to the video card?
As Oto wrote, charging using USB-C is limited to 100W currently (future standard will change it), whereas real consumption can be higher. To compare standard charger and UBS-C makes sense, on the other hand you wrote it was fine in the pat.
Regards,
Jan
Bentley Accredited Developer: iTwin Platform - AssociateLabyrinth Technology | dev.notes() | cad.point
Here GLSTATS:
QVision version 03.42.17 - 24.Jun.2016, 32-bit (cvs)
Seurat Context [1]: Image Format = 8-bit int per band Depth Format = 32-bit float1 or more adapters support interfaceadapter on monitor 10001 supports interface 10
Direct3D11 Context for hwnd 13121a on adapter 0: HAL/hardware Device (generation 0) Feature Level 11.0 Shader Model 5 Graphics Card Driver from NVIDIA maximum number of lights: 16 additional clip planes: 16 largest texture: 16384 by 16384 D3D capabilities: occlusionQuery 1 scissorTest 1 uvwSupport 1 colorMask 1
System Information: Computer: Name: ######-##-CAD08 Mfgr: LENOVO Model: 20HH0018GE OS: System: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Arch: 64-bit Version: 10.0.19043 Memory: 7.81 GB Processor: Name: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7820HQ CPU @ 2.90GHz Addr: 64 Cores: 4 Graphics Adapter 1: Name: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mode: 1920 x 1080 x 32-bit color @ 60 Hz Memory: 4095.00 MB Drivers: C:\WINDOWS\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\nvlt.inf_amd64_91f4c43bb194a2cd\nvldumdx.dll,C:\WINDOWS\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\nvlt.inf_amd64_91f4c Version: 27.21.14.6230 Date: Montag, 5. April 2021 00:00 Feature: D3D11 Feature Level 11.1 RastAvl: D3D11 D3D9 SEURAT DevID: PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_1436&SUBSYS_224D17AA&REV_A1 Graphics Adapter 2: Name: Intel(R) HD Graphics 630 Mode: 1920 x 1080 x 32-bit color @ 60 Hz Memory: 1024.00 MB Drivers: C:\WINDOWS\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\iigd_dch.inf_amd64_8829ad0eb26b3ef6\igdumdim64.dll,C:\WINDOWS\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\iigd_dch.inf_a Version: 27.20.100.9320 Date: Mittwoch, 7. April 2021 00:00 Feature: Unknown RastAvl: DevID: PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_591B&SUBSYS_224D17AA&REV_04\3&11583659&0&10 Monitor 1: Name: HP 24e Display Adapter: 1 (NVIDIA Quadro M2200) Origin: 0, 0 Size: 1920 x 1080 PPI: 96 x 96 Monitor 2: Name: HP 24e Display Adapter: 1 (NVIDIA Quadro M2200) Origin: 1920, 0 Size: 1920 x 1080 PPI: 96 x 96 Main Window: Origin: -8, -8 Size: 1936 x 1066 On Monitor: 1 Time Zone: (UTC+01:00) Belgrade, Bratislava, Budapest, Ljubljana, Prague Direct3D Runtime: Version: 11.0 QVision: Version: 03.42.17 - 24.Jun.2016 Runtime: 32-bit (cvs) Rasterizer: D3D11 Feature Level 11.0 PixDraw: 998.3 MPx/s (1920 x 1080) PixShdwVol: 51836.7 MPx/s (1920 x 1080) Init Time: 01:34:38 PM Mon Aug 02 2021
Thanks for the details!
I do not see anything obviously wrong, and even when I compared it with mine notebook, equipped with GeForce GTX1050, the numbers look similar.
Some differences exist:
But they are not reason for wrong display (even when sometimes specific Nvidia drivers causes problems in MicroStation in the past).
I noticed that your driver version is a bit older than 471.41. Did you get a chance to update your driver from https://www.nvidia.com/Download/driverResults.aspx/177764/en-us and try your workflow?