In CE17 there seems to be another layer of messy configuration options bar in already confusing config jungle. How can I get rid of them? Our Microstaton users no need to access any example configs as we use our company workspace only. Therefore I would like to turn obsolete items off so that only our own config options would be visible. What's the point making the GUI more complicated? Who needs this?
Documentation is here: Creating and Managing Configurations (bentley.com). The XML syntax is not currently included in help. It is covered by this new blog: Configuration Tips - Manage Configuration Utility.
Configurations are stored in C:\Users\...\AppData\Local\Bentley\MicroStation\10.0.0\prefs\configuration.xml.
This file can be copied to any users provided that the path(s) stored in the XML for each configuration is/are valid for each user.
The example configuration can be hidden by editing the XML, set the IsActive statement to false:
<IsActive>false</IsActive>
Development is continuing to work on this feature so these comments will be taken note of.
This feature was introduced in response to demand from our users for multiple configurations and does offer a more flexible mechanism for control of configurations, we need to do some further work to address the questions in this thread.
Regards
Marc
What's the best way to suggest changes to this feature? Microstation ideas site, post on communities or open a service request?
Why was this feature introduced if development is still working on it?Why was it developed with no way to protect it from the users?
Does the configuration.xml NEED to be local, or is there a way to locate that on a network drive as part of an Organization configuration?
MaryB
Power GeoPak 08.11.09.918Power InRoads 08.11.09.918OpenRoads Designer 2021 R2
This feature actually started shipping in ORD (and I think OBM but I don't follow it as close). Looks like I created a configuration.xml file for the tool i have for updating user's configurations in November of last year. The format of the 2 XML files appears identical (although the Microstation one the xml header claims to be utf-16, but the file format is utf-8. no idea if that causes issues).
In my configuration I removed the unneeded configuration and setup the one config for what we do. I initially thought this might be useful for flipping between FDOT's config and our normal config but using this to accomplish it requires the user set the configuration in the UI. Leveraging FDOT's custom application icons we can switch on the fly and the user really doesn't have to do anything.
I still want a variable to be able to move the configuration.xml file so I don't have to maintain 5 of them (2 versions of ORD, 2 versions of OBM and MicroStation) for each user.
This is my Configuration.xml from ORD (we had already switched to using _USTN_USER_CONFIGURATION variable in configurationsetup.cfg as it works better for us)
<?xml version="1.0"?> <ArrayOfConfigurationModel xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> <ConfigurationModel> <Title>HNTB Configuration</Title> <Description>HNTB Server Configuration</Description> <ConfigurationVariable>_USTN_USER_CONFIGURATION</ConfigurationVariable> <Type>Local</Type> <IsActive>true</IsActive> <Path>C:\CADDLib\Connect\</Path> <IsSelected>false</IsSelected> <IsEditable>true</IsEditable> </ConfigurationModel> </ArrayOfConfigurationModel>
I've played with the configration.xml here's some things I've noted:
I agree in thinking I could use this for FDOT and a few others, but I don't like that this is user based and XML.
Why are they mixing how the configuration works (XML verses text files) ?
Timothy Hickman
CADD Manager | CADD Department
timothy.hickman@colliersengineering.com
Main: 877 627 3772|
1000 Waterview Drive Suite 201 | Hamilton, New Jersey 08691