XM-2004 print/pen table places element order differenthttps://communities.bentley.com/products/microstation/microstation_printing/f/archived-microstation-v8-xm-edition-printing-and-plotting-forum/42018/xm-2004-print-pen-table-places-element-order-differentI am using the same dgn, plt and tbl between XM and 2004. In 2004 the line is above the filled shape as wanted. In XM, it is below the shape. I thought it was coming from the pen table because if I detach the pen table in XM, it looks ok. I have alsoen-USTelligent Community 12Re: XM-2004 print/pen table places element order differenthttps://communities.bentley.com/thread/93617?ContentTypeID=1Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:00:23 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:c35b65a8-10d3-41c4-a5da-bfafef0017b7tomornerI am working in 2d files only. The biggest issue is why would I get different results from the 2 versions?<div style="clear:both;"></div>Re: XM-2004 print/pen table places element order differenthttps://communities.bentley.com/thread/93610?ContentTypeID=1Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:48:51 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:1cd281d7-2077-44e9-b64c-dbe71b125f58caddcopAre you in a 3D file? Are you aware that elevation is the default method of prioritizing elements unless you change the default configuration?<div style="clear:both;"></div>Re: XM-2004 print/pen table places element order differenthttps://communities.bentley.com/thread/93588?ContentTypeID=1Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:49:24 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:52decb95-6e56-4a4d-8c81-a1769299ae37tomorner<p> I noticed in my pen table I have priority Sections set to -1, 0, 1, 2. The priority 1 section contols the screen filled shape and the black lines that should be on top are controlled by the priority 2 section. So that should work </p> <p> If I adjust these priority numbers down so that they read -5, -4, -3, 2.....then it works. I'm not changing the actual order just the number so that all &quot;bottom&quot; sections are negative. Not sure why it works this way in XM. </p><div style="clear:both;"></div>