I would question the value of creating a 300dpi image meant for a final output size of 8'x4'.
Large images like that are usually viewed from several feet away and a such seldom benefit from the added resolution. To the contrary, they take longer to render and print, and often cause problems when sending them to the printer/plotter.
We normally use a maximum of 150 dpi for posters. This allows us to create displays which maintain smooth, readable text and smooth line work. If the final image doesn't have any text or line work, where aliasing of the edges is most noticable, you could probably reduce the dpi to something like 100dpi or lower and still achieve acceptable results.
Just because a printer or plotter is capable of 300, 600, or even 1200 dpi output doesn't mean they require(/or benefit from) that resolution in the image being printed. The determining factor for resolution of the image your are rendering in MicroStation should be, "What is the lowest resolution that produces acceptable results at the desired viewing distance?" You can try a small 1'x1' section of the image rendered at various dpi (72, 100, 150, 300, etc...), and plot each out at 1'x1' and compare the results.
Use the lowest resolution that looks good.
HTH, -Ron
Ustn since 1988SS4 - i7-3.45Ghz-16 Gb-250/1Tb/1Tb-Win8.1-64bEric D. MilbergerArchitect + Master Planner + BIMSenior Master Planner NASA - Marshall Space Flight CenterThe Milberger Architectural Group, llc
thank you both for your replies. however, i am aware, and have informed the client, that 300 dpi is a bit 'over the top' but they were insistent. so, what the owner wants, the owner gets.
so, back to the original question. anyone?
Hi mswede,
I'm afraid that if you want to render very high resolution images you have to consider to buy more ram and probably a 64 bit version of Windows.
And even that can't ensure the rendering will succeed. A resolution of 28,800 (I presume horizontal) lines, is very extreem for a rendering.
Option 2 is to render you're image at for example 150 dpi and increase the size in Photoshop.
Regards
anyway, thanks for the reply and the option. i was thinking of doing that if i couldn't get this to work.
Matthew,
I'd suggest to render as big image as your RAM allows you (guess you're on 64bit system) and then use Photoshop to enlarge the image - I had quite good results using Genuine FractalsPhotoShop plugin ... check their page >
http://www.ononesoftware.com/detail.php?prodLine_id=7
HTH
p.
/pt
FWIW: Here's a link to an excellent explanation of DPI, PPI, image resolution and the confusion many people have about it. The Myth of DPI
Also from the same site: What Magazines / Printers Really Want The Arithmetic of DPI (You might want to send these links to your client.)
HTH, Ron