<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>08. Number of Heat exchanger tubes and path are different in the AutoPIPE Vessel report, why?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/38207/08-number-of-heat-exchanger-tubes-and-path-are-different-in-the-autopipe-vessel-report-why</link><description /><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>08. Number of Heat exchanger tubes and path are different in the AutoPIPE Vessel report, why?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/38207/08-number-of-heat-exchanger-tubes-and-path-are-different-in-the-autopipe-vessel-report-why</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:55:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5aae009b-d8b2-479f-b02a-e85daaf06920</guid><dc:creator>JamieP</dc:creator><comments>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/38207/08-number-of-heat-exchanger-tubes-and-path-are-different-in-the-autopipe-vessel-report-why#comments</comments><description>Current Revision posted to AutoPIPE Wiki by JamieP on 8/24/2020 3:55:36 PM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;table style="background-color:#dce5f0;border:0px solid #dce5f0;width:600px;"&gt;&lt;colgroup&gt;&lt;col width="20%" /&gt; &lt;col width="80%" /&gt;&lt;/colgroup&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Applies To &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Product(s):&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;AutoPIPE Vessel&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Version(s):&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;ALL&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Area:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Calculations&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date Logged&lt;br /&gt;&amp;amp; Current Version&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;March 2018&lt;br /&gt;40.06.00.07&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;span style="color:#993300;text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Problem:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:60px;"&gt;In the model, &amp;quot;Tubular implantation&amp;quot;, the number of tubes and the tubular path&amp;nbsp;are correct. However, in the report the are different,&amp;nbsp; why?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;span style="color:#993300;text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Solution:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:60px;"&gt;Most common cause was a change in the geometry of the exchanger (AKU-&amp;gt; Weed) but this information was not updated in the &amp;quot;Beam&amp;quot; tab. Geometry no longer matches the TEMA type, which leads to inconsistent results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:60px;"&gt;It is always risky to change the TEMA type of an exchanger because it requires a lot of data to be reverified.&amp;nbsp;In this case, it was necessary to at least change the type (AKU-&amp;gt; Weed):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;See Also&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;a href="/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/bentley-autopipe.aspx"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bentley AutoPIPE&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="LEARN Server" href="http://lms.bentley.com"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bentley LEARN Server&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;img style="border-width:0px;" alt=" " height="60" src="/cfs-file.ashx/__key/communityserver-components-sitefiles/TSG-Logo.png" width="189" /&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style="font-size: 90%;"&gt;Tags: tube numbers, tubelayout, AutoPIPE Vessel, chamber number, heat exchanger, Report&lt;/div&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Q. Number of Heat exchanger tubes and path are different in the AutoPIPE Vessel report, why?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/38207/08-number-of-heat-exchanger-tubes-and-path-are-different-in-the-autopipe-vessel-report-why/revision/4</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 19:19:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5aae009b-d8b2-479f-b02a-e85daaf06920</guid><dc:creator>Mike Dattilio</dc:creator><comments>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/38207/08-number-of-heat-exchanger-tubes-and-path-are-different-in-the-autopipe-vessel-report-why#comments</comments><description>Revision 4 posted to AutoPIPE Wiki by Mike Dattilio on 6/28/2018 7:19:42 PM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;table style="background-color:#dce5f0;border:0px solid #dce5f0;width:600px;"&gt;&lt;colgroup&gt;&lt;col width="20%" /&gt; &lt;col width="80%" /&gt;&lt;/colgroup&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Applies To &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Product(s):&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;AutoPIPE Vessel&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Version(s):&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;ALL&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Area:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Calculations&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date Logged&lt;br /&gt;&amp;amp; Current Version&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;March 2018&lt;br /&gt;40.06.00.07&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;span style="color:#993300;text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Problem:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:60px;"&gt;In the model, &amp;quot;Tubular implantation&amp;quot;, the number of tubes and the tubular path&amp;nbsp;are correct. However, in the report the are different,&amp;nbsp; why?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;span style="color:#993300;text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Solution:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:60px;"&gt;Most common cause was a change in the geometry of the exchanger (AKU-&amp;gt; Weed) but this information was not updated in the &amp;quot;Beam&amp;quot; tab. Geometry no longer matches the TEMA type, which leads to inconsistent results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:60px;"&gt;It is always risky to change the TEMA type of an exchanger because it requires a lot of data to be reverified.&amp;nbsp;In this case, it was necessary to at least change the type (AKU-&amp;gt; Weed):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;See Also&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;a href="/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/bentley-autopipe.aspx"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bentley AutoPIPE&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="LEARN Server" href="http://lms.bentley.com"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bentley LEARN Server&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;img style="border-width:0px;" alt=" " height="60" src="/cfs-file.ashx/__key/communityserver-components-sitefiles/TSG-Logo.png" width="189" /&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style="font-size: 90%;"&gt;Tags: tube numbers, tubelayout, AutoPIPE Vessel, chamber number, heat exchanger, Report&lt;/div&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Q. Number of Heat exchanger tubes and path are different in the AutoPIPE Vessel report, why?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/38207/08-number-of-heat-exchanger-tubes-and-path-are-different-in-the-autopipe-vessel-report-why/revision/3</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 19:19:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5aae009b-d8b2-479f-b02a-e85daaf06920</guid><dc:creator>Mike Dattilio</dc:creator><comments>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/38207/08-number-of-heat-exchanger-tubes-and-path-are-different-in-the-autopipe-vessel-report-why#comments</comments><description>Revision 3 posted to AutoPIPE Wiki by Mike Dattilio on 6/28/2018 7:19:13 PM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;table style="background-color:#dce5f0;border:0px solid #dce5f0;width:600px;"&gt;&lt;colgroup&gt;&lt;col width="20%" /&gt; &lt;col width="80%" /&gt;&lt;/colgroup&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Applies To &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Product(s):&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;AutoPIPE Vessel&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Version(s):&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;ALL&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Area:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Calculations&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date Logged&lt;br /&gt;&amp;amp; Current Version&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;March 2018&lt;br /&gt;40.06.00.07&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;span style="color:#993300;text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Problem:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:60px;"&gt;In the model, &amp;quot;Tubular implantation&amp;quot;, the number of tubes and the tubular path&amp;nbsp;are correct. However, in the report the are different,&amp;nbsp; why?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;span style="color:#993300;text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Solution:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:60px;"&gt;Most common cause was a change in the geometry of the exchanger (AKU-&amp;gt; Weed) but this information was not updated in the &amp;quot;Beam&amp;quot; tab. Geometry no longer matches the TEMA type, which leads to inconsistent results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:60px;"&gt;It is always risky to change the TEMA type of an exchanger because it requires a lot of data to be reverified.&amp;nbsp;In this case, it was necessary to at least change the type (AKU-&amp;gt; Weed):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;See Also&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;a href="/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/bentley-autopipe.aspx"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bentley AutoPIPE&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="LEARN Server" href="http://lms.bentley.com"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bentley LEARN Server&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;img style="border-width:0px;" alt=" " height="60" src="/cfs-file.ashx/__key/communityserver-components-sitefiles/TSG-Logo.png" width="189" /&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style="font-size: 90%;"&gt;Tags: tubelayout, AutoPIPE Vessel, chamber number, heat exchanger&lt;/div&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Number of Heat exchanger tubes, but in calculates there is a different path and number of tubes when using AutoPIPE Vessel, why?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/38207/08-number-of-heat-exchanger-tubes-and-path-are-different-in-the-autopipe-vessel-report-why/revision/2</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2018 19:10:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5aae009b-d8b2-479f-b02a-e85daaf06920</guid><dc:creator>Mike Dattilio</dc:creator><comments>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/38207/08-number-of-heat-exchanger-tubes-and-path-are-different-in-the-autopipe-vessel-report-why#comments</comments><description>Revision 2 posted to AutoPIPE Wiki by Mike Dattilio on 6/28/2018 7:10:04 PM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;table style="background-color:#dce5f0;border:0px solid #dce5f0;width:600px;"&gt;&lt;colgroup&gt;&lt;col width="20%" /&gt; &lt;col width="80%" /&gt;&lt;/colgroup&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Applies To &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Product(s):&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;AutoPIPE Vessel&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Version(s):&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;ALL&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Area:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Calculations&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date Logged&lt;br /&gt;&amp;amp; Current Version&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;March 2018&lt;br /&gt;40.06.00.07&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;span style="color:#993300;text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Problem:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:60px;"&gt;&amp;quot;Tubular implantation&amp;quot;, the number of tubes and the tubular path is correct, however, in the calculations there are a different path and the number of tubes was not correct.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;span style="color:#993300;text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Solution:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:60px;"&gt;Most common cause was a change in the geometry of the exchanger (AKU-&amp;gt; Weed) but this information was not updated in the &amp;quot;Beam&amp;quot; tab. Geometry no longer matches the TEMA type, which leads to inconsistent results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:60px;"&gt;It is always risky to change the TEMA type of an exchanger because it requires a lot of data to be reverified.&amp;nbsp;In this case, it was necessary to at least change the type (AKU-&amp;gt; Weed):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;See Also&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;a href="/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/bentley-autopipe.aspx"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bentley AutoPIPE&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="LEARN Server" href="http://lms.bentley.com"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bentley LEARN Server&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;img style="border-width:0px;" alt=" " height="60" src="/cfs-file.ashx/__key/communityserver-components-sitefiles/TSG-Logo.png" width="189" /&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style="font-size: 90%;"&gt;Tags: tubelayout, AutoPIPE Vessel, heat exchanger&lt;/div&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Number of Heat exchanger tubes, but in calculates there is a different path and number of tubes when using AutoPIPE Vessel, why?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/38207/08-number-of-heat-exchanger-tubes-and-path-are-different-in-the-autopipe-vessel-report-why/revision/1</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 19:22:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5aae009b-d8b2-479f-b02a-e85daaf06920</guid><dc:creator>Mike Dattilio</dc:creator><comments>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/38207/08-number-of-heat-exchanger-tubes-and-path-are-different-in-the-autopipe-vessel-report-why#comments</comments><description>Revision 1 posted to AutoPIPE Wiki by Mike Dattilio on 4/12/2018 7:22:48 PM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;table style="background-color:#dce5f0;border:0px solid #dce5f0;width:600px;"&gt;&lt;colgroup&gt;&lt;col width="20%" /&gt; &lt;col width="80%" /&gt;&lt;/colgroup&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:medium;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Applies To &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Product(s):&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;AutoPIPE Vessel&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Version(s):&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;ALL&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Area:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Calculations&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td style="text-align:right;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Date Logged&lt;br /&gt;&amp;amp; Current Version&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;March 2018&lt;br /&gt;40.06.00.07&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;span style="color:#993300;text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Problem:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:60px;"&gt;&amp;quot;Tubular implantation&amp;quot;, the number of tubes and the tubular path is correct, however, in the calculations there are a different path and the number of tubes was not correct.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;span style="color:#993300;text-decoration:underline;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Solution:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:60px;"&gt;Most common cause was a change in the geometry of the exchanger (AKU-&amp;gt; Weed) but this information was not updated in the &amp;quot;Beam&amp;quot; tab. Geometry no longer matches the TEMA type, which leads to inconsistent results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:60px;"&gt;It is always risky to change the TEMA type of an exchanger because it requires a lot of data to be reverified.&amp;nbsp;In this case, it was necessary to at least change the type (AKU-&amp;gt; Weed):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;See Also&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;a href="/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/bentley-autopipe.aspx"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bentley AutoPIPE&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="LEARN Server" href="http://lms.bentley.com"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bentley LEARN Server&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;img style="border-width:0px;" alt=" " height="60" src="/cfs-file.ashx/__key/communityserver-components-sitefiles/TSG-Logo.png" width="189" /&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;div style="font-size: 90%;"&gt;Tags: tubelayout, AutoPIPE Vessel, heat exchanger, Heat Exchangers&lt;/div&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>