<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>02. Why does a BEW heat exchanger designed to CODAP 2005 not calculate to § C7.A9.6 (sliding head exchanger)?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/51701/02-why-does-a-bew-heat-exchanger-designed-to-codap-2005-not-calculate-to-c7-a9-6-sliding-head-exchanger</link><description /><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>02. Why does a BEW heat exchanger designed to CODAP 2005 not calculate to § C7.A9.6 (sliding head exchanger)?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/51701/02-why-does-a-bew-heat-exchanger-designed-to-codap-2005-not-calculate-to-c7-a9-6-sliding-head-exchanger</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 05:37:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4f04ee95-b7ad-425e-b043-ae5a89e047ce</guid><dc:creator>Tanaji Gaikwad</dc:creator><comments>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/51701/02-why-does-a-bew-heat-exchanger-designed-to-codap-2005-not-calculate-to-c7-a9-6-sliding-head-exchanger#comments</comments><description>Current Revision posted to AutoPIPE Wiki by Tanaji Gaikwad on 8/3/2023 5:37:15 AM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AutoPIPE Vessel team decided to not apply the Annex C7.A9 for sliding tubesheet because this chapter is not sufficient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no rule to determine the thickness of the tubesheet, so we decided to follow the same rules as floating tubesheets; like the other codes (ASME, EN) do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a conservative approach to be sure that the thickness of the tubesheet is sufficient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the way, the behavior of a sliding tubesheet is similar to the one of a floating tubesheet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-wikis-components-files/00-00-00-00-41/CODAP-C7_5F00_A9_5F00_5.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description></item><item><title>03. Why does a BEW heat exchanger designed to CODAP 2005 not calculate to § C7.A9.6 (sliding head exchanger)?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/51701/02-why-does-a-bew-heat-exchanger-designed-to-codap-2005-not-calculate-to-c7-a9-6-sliding-head-exchanger/revision/3</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 05:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4f04ee95-b7ad-425e-b043-ae5a89e047ce</guid><dc:creator>Tanaji Gaikwad</dc:creator><comments>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/51701/02-why-does-a-bew-heat-exchanger-designed-to-codap-2005-not-calculate-to-c7-a9-6-sliding-head-exchanger#comments</comments><description>Revision 3 posted to AutoPIPE Wiki by Tanaji Gaikwad on 8/3/2023 5:37:00 AM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AutoPIPE Vessel team decided to not apply the Annex C7.A9 for sliding tubesheet because this chapter is not sufficient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no rule to determine the thickness of the tubesheet, so we decided to follow the same rules as floating tubesheets; like the other codes (ASME, EN) do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a conservative approach to be sure that the thickness of the tubesheet is sufficient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the way, the behavior of a sliding tubesheet is similar to the one of a floating tubesheet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-wikis-components-files/00-00-00-00-41/CODAP-C7_5F00_A9_5F00_5.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description></item><item><title>27. Why does a BEW heat exchanger designed to CODAP 2005 not calculate to § C7.A9.6 (sliding head exchanger)?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/51701/02-why-does-a-bew-heat-exchanger-designed-to-codap-2005-not-calculate-to-c7-a9-6-sliding-head-exchanger/revision/2</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 11:09:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4f04ee95-b7ad-425e-b043-ae5a89e047ce</guid><dc:creator>Tanaji Gaikwad</dc:creator><comments>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/51701/02-why-does-a-bew-heat-exchanger-designed-to-codap-2005-not-calculate-to-c7-a9-6-sliding-head-exchanger#comments</comments><description>Revision 2 posted to AutoPIPE Wiki by Tanaji Gaikwad on 8/2/2023 11:09:02 AM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AutoPIPE Vessel team decided to not apply the Annex C7.A9 for sliding tubesheet because this chapter is not sufficient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no rule to determine the thickness of the tubesheet, so we decided to follow the same rules as floating tubesheets; like the other codes (ASME, EN) do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a conservative approach to be sure that the thickness of the tubesheet is sufficient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the way, the behavior of a sliding tubesheet is similar to the one of a floating tubesheet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-wikis-components-files/00-00-00-00-41/CODAP-C7_5F00_A9_5F00_5.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description></item><item><title>27. Why does a BEW heat exchanger designed to CODAP 2005 not calculate to § C7.A9.6 (sliding head exchanger)?</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/51701/02-why-does-a-bew-heat-exchanger-designed-to-codap-2005-not-calculate-to-c7-a9-6-sliding-head-exchanger/revision/1</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:37:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4f04ee95-b7ad-425e-b043-ae5a89e047ce</guid><dc:creator>Luke Andrew</dc:creator><comments>https://communities.bentley.com/products/pipe_stress_analysis/w/pipe_stress_analysis__wiki/51701/02-why-does-a-bew-heat-exchanger-designed-to-codap-2005-not-calculate-to-c7-a9-6-sliding-head-exchanger#comments</comments><description>Revision 1 posted to AutoPIPE Wiki by Luke Andrew on 9/30/2020 2:37:22 PM&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AutoPIPE Vessel team decided to not apply the Annex C7.A9 for sliding tubesheet because this chapter is not sufficient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no rule to determine the thickness of the tubesheet, so we decided to follow the same rules as floating tubesheets; like the other codes (ASME, EN) do.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a conservative approach to be sure that the thickness of the tubesheet is sufficient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By the way, the behavior of a sliding tubesheet is similar to the one of a floating tubesheet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-wikis-components-files/00-00-00-00-41/CODAP-C7_5F00_A9_5F00_5.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>