https://communities.bentley.com/products/rail_design/f/openrail-forum/201918/openrail-turnouts-dutch-regulationHello All, I have been checking the turnouts in OpenRail that are by default inin OpenRail and if they are corresponding with our dutch client regulation for heavy rail. About this i have a few questions. According dutch regulation: •turnout GWen-USTelligent Community 12https://communities.bentley.com/thread/644848?ContentTypeID=1Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:24:12 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:0d2c8445-fd0e-41e9-958c-d544f5aef8fbjpln<p>Unfortunately we don&#39;t have the standards for all countries and resources to search and implement.</p> <p>Even those provided are not certified by the relevant authorities.</p> <p>As much as we can, we are helping to implement and deliver as part of the default workspace if possible.</p> <p>BE Communities could be a good place to share turnout libraries if users are willing to.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/643977?ContentTypeID=1Sun, 11 Apr 2021 12:59:37 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:93784545-2ac7-40bc-bfee-a398c6fbf83dOm Prakash Singh, BE (Civil) ,MTech(Transportation Engg) MENGNZ, MIEAust NER RPEQ,M.PWI UK, <p>At least right or wrong some turnout is available. In other countries like UK/India/Singapore/Malaysia/USA and other countries, no turnout/Crossing library provided by Bentley. These shall be provided in the common Library.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/643976?ContentTypeID=1Sun, 11 Apr 2021 12:49:51 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:13c4d7c8-96e8-48ae-be02-5ee59518b6c1Om Prakash Singh, BE (Civil) ,MTech(Transportation Engg) MENGNZ, MIEAust NER RPEQ,M.PWI UK, <p>I do not know why Bentley does not develop a standard library of turnout for each country where they selling the product. These shall be accessible in the common library.&nbsp;</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/643886?ContentTypeID=1Fri, 09 Apr 2021 16:46:54 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:6b81c7ae-6081-4fd7-aa62-f84125f80d7fjpln<p>Sorry I missed this last post. yes 2020 R3 XML export (2.0) includes cant. Speed is part of cant.</p> <p>By the way, unfortunately Diamonds are still wrong in 2020 R3, not only NL. A defect is logged and I highlighted it to product manager.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/604710?ContentTypeID=1Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:16:39 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7df5c4de-1400-40b3-ac2d-bd548f29c1c9Ariaan<p>Thanks for you&#39;re reaction JP</p> <p>My colleague will make an enhancement reguest / defect report. Somehow this is not visible in my connection client.</p> <p>Also succes with the investigation towards the KRS type turnouts.</p> <p></p> <p>PS just an other question about OpenRail that you maybe can answer.</p> <p>Is in the latest version of OpenRail release 3 the export off the alignment to an XML-file fixed so that in the XML-file&nbsp;the&nbsp;horizontal/vertical design and the speed and the cant is included. I know this is an issue in release 1 of OpenRail that the xml-file did not have the cant and speed in the XML-file.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/604506?ContentTypeID=1Tue, 18 Aug 2020 10:50:25 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:adaa3f25-07c4-4886-a84b-1436555ea25cjpln<p>Thank you for your feedback.</p> <p>I would suggest to fill an enhancement request / defect so that we can amend the existing dgnlib and deliver something better.</p> <p>However, as far as I know,&nbsp; there is no certification from the regulation authority.</p> <p>For the KRS 1:4.5 it needs investigation to check what is going wrong and fill a defect if necessary. I will have a look.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>