https://communities.bentley.com/products/rail_design/f/openrail-forum/218788/chainage-not-showing-for-cant-on-my-xml-export-ord-10-08-01-33-or-10-10-01-03Hi - hope someone can help, please. I exported my design from MX in LandXML format, which I know from experience loses the cant. That&#39;s all okay, though. But I&#39;ve gone through the steps to add the cant and re-export the XML, but am having some troubleen-USTelligent Community 12https://communities.bentley.com/thread/738028?ContentTypeID=1Sat, 22 Oct 2022 23:04:04 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:cf52d81d-52ac-4d2c-98e8-d7ec635067bbAdam Riley<p>Hi - just confirming that I&#39;ve managed to export an XML file successfully from ORD 10.11.00.115 / CE 2022 Release 1 Update 11 and the chainage for the cant now shows as expected. Thanks for the fix!</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/735227?ContentTypeID=1Wed, 05 Oct 2022 17:04:29 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:41783d44-7fca-4065-b701-4ad910ee6c4aAdam Riley<p>Hi <a href="/members/4a87e3b1_2d00_df74_2d00_4456_2d00_ac6b_2d00_bf95f6096fc3">jpln</a> - I&#39;m currently using&nbsp;OpenRail Designer CE 10.10.01.03 (2021 Release 1 Update 10), and I&#39;ve come across the exact same problem.&nbsp;The cant is not showing the correct chainage when importing an XML file. Has this been resolved in a version of ORD I don&#39;t yet have, or is the issue not fixed yet? Many thanks.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/671729?ContentTypeID=1Tue, 14 Sep 2021 10:14:25 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8bfd2c81-15eb-45da-b5a4-5bebbd133d53Adam Riley<p>Thanks for reply. Hope it&#39;s an easy fix.</p> <p>I&#39;ve also tried bringing in Through Alignment Design XMLs that were originally Genios converted into XML using BRT (which have cant included)... but when importing to ORD, the cant seems to be missing, so it needs to be built from scratch again.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/671593?ContentTypeID=1Mon, 13 Sep 2021 17:54:03 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:06e01a6f-6359-4a49-bd90-f2129a9be62ajpln<p>So it looks like the description of the XML standard for cant impose to use what we name the &quot;internal station&quot;, so not the one you see.</p> <p>So the export is good according to XML standards and our import is wrong because it should convert this internal station to the alignment stationing. We have a defect.</p> <p>So if alignment Station at start is 1500 (internal station 0), cant alignment in XML shows 0 but should be converted to 1500 during the import.</p> <p> </p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/670310?ContentTypeID=1Tue, 07 Sep 2021 09:39:06 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:505f1389-5281-4d84-b973-62dbd3e0bf3fjpln<p>Unfortunately you didn&#39;t miss anything. There is a bug.&nbsp;</p> <p><a class="caption" href="https://tfs.bentley.com/tfs/ProductLine/Civil%20Design/_workitems/edit/1097561">Defect 1097561:</a><span class="info-text">Geometry&gt;Export XML: stationing not used for cant</span></p> <p><span class="info-text">I am investigating why it is not fixed in 10.10.01.03 (reported in 10.09)</span></p><div style="clear:both;"></div>