Not sure the below image will be readable, but the issue is simple (solution may not be).
Plan (horizontal) is annotated using chord definition of stationing. It seems right.
Profile still seems to "want to" annotate using arc method stationing. The two tracking boxes that pop up when using tracking (aka civil analysis) show different results. The one on the right (blue text on white background) shows arc method stationing when there are no equations in the alignment. When equations are added, I honestly don't know what it's showing. The box on the left appears to show the CORRECT station and coordinates (verified via plan view).
More important, both the annotation AND output files seem to be following whatever's in the "bad box" on the right. In other words, the station in plan view is different than the station in profile view.
BTW: We're still looking at it, but it appears even the "legacy" software (Inroads/BRT) may have also done this. There wasn't really a convenient way of checking it in the past with simultaneous tracking.
Has anyone figured out a solution or a workaround for this issue?
There is a defect logged for that issue. It should be fixed in upcoming release.
Bug 1289915: Stations in profiles annotation incorrect when using chorded alignments
Is there a date set for the next release will be available?