<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Member Check to AISC 360-10 and AISC Design Guide 9</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/106336/member-check-to-aisc-360-10-and-aisc-design-guide-9</link><description>Hi, I have some questions regarding member check to AISC 360-10. 
 So I was doing some check on a simple member (attached output file), and then I checked it using hand calculation to verify the numbers (I need to know how the program do simpler problem</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Member Check to AISC 360-10 and AISC Design Guide 9</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/320813?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 10:48:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4a2ff606-ea2c-4147-be3f-18e21acda715</guid><dc:creator>Biswatosh</dc:creator><description>Regarding your second query, AISC 360-10  does not follow the first formula that you have cited in your illustration. It follows the second one one shown in your illustration.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Member Check to AISC 360-10 and AISC Design Guide 9</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/320804?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 09:34:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:fc9d01c6-d165-43f5-8a38-e2c3817fb5ad</guid><dc:creator>Podianko Surya</dc:creator><description>Thank you for the reply. Please do let me know if there&amp;#39;s anything regarding the query 2 as well. :)&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Member Check to AISC 360-10 and AISC Design Guide 9</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/320799?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 08:47:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:85f78317-8ee0-4fff-869d-9859b1dda63d</guid><dc:creator>Biswatosh</dc:creator><description>Regarding your query 1, your point is correct. The software is calculating the shear area in minor axis as 2/3 x Total area of the flanges. But according to the section G7 ( Chapter G) of AISC, it should use the full areas of the flanges, Aw=(bf*tf). Our development team is already aware of this fact and they are working on to rectify this in the forthcoming Staad release.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>