Torsional Stiffness

Hi,

I have this kind of model with  a cantilevered structure attached unto it as shown below in the image.

I'm a bit puzzled of the deflection result and i'm worried there is something wrong in my model. Can somebody explain this: whenever i use I section in the beam holding the cantilever structure the deflection is 184.069 mm whereas using hollow section for the same beam resulted to a minimal deflection of 4.523 mm. Is it because of the torsional stiffness greatly offered by hollow section than the open section? How does STAAD calculate deflection considering torsional constant of section? The deflection reduces to almost 95% and i want to be enlightened on this.

Thank you!

M.Mac

Parents
  • Please upload the model. Also what is the TUBE section you are using ?



  • Hi Sye,

    Please find below staad input file. This is based on hollow section 450x280x10mm .

    STAAD SPACE
    START JOB INFORMATION
    ENGINEER DATE 12-Oct-15
    END JOB INFORMATION
    INPUT WIDTH 79
    UNIT METER KN
    JOINT COORDINATES
    1 0 0 0; 2 4.5 0 0; 3 0 0 -0.3; 4 0 0 1.5; 5 0 0 1.3; 6 4.5 0 1.3;
    7 4.5 0 -0.3; 8 4.5 0 1.5; 9 1.35 0 0; 10 2.15 0 0; 11 0.748 0 0; 12 2.752 0 0;
    13 1.35 -0.7 0; 14 2.15 -0.7 0; 15 1.35 -0.15 0; 16 2.15 -0.15 0;
    19 1.35 -0.7 -2.1; 20 2.15 -0.7 -2.1; 21 1.35 -0.7 -1.35; 22 2.15 -0.7 -1.35;
    23 2.15 -0.515873 -0.994898; 24 1.35 -0.515873 -0.994898;
    25 2.15 -0.147619 -0.284695; 26 1.35 -0.147619 -0.284695;
    27 1.75 -0.331746 -0.639796;
    MEMBER INCIDENCES
    1 3 1; 2 1 5; 3 5 4; 4 7 2; 5 2 6; 6 6 8; 7 1 11; 8 5 6; 9 9 10; 10 10 12;
    11 11 9; 12 12 2; 13 13 15; 14 14 16; 15 14 12; 16 13 11; 17 15 9; 18 16 10;
    19 15 16; 20 13 14; 25 21 13; 26 22 14; 27 22 23; 28 21 24; 29 21 22; 30 20 22;
    31 19 21; 32 23 25; 33 24 26; 34 25 10; 35 26 9; 36 23 27; 37 24 27; 38 27 26;
    39 27 25; 40 20 19;
    START GROUP DEFINITION
    MEMBER
    _SHS100X100X5MM 15 16 19 20 27 TO 29 32 TO 35 40
    _EA50X50X5MM 36 TO 39
    _8"X8"X46.1KG.M. 13 14 17 18 25 26 30 31
    _NEW_STRUCTURE 13 TO 20 25 TO 40
    END GROUP DEFINITION
    START USER TABLE
    TABLE 1
    UNIT METER KN
    WIDE FLANGE
    350X250X69.2
    0.00884459 0.341045 0.00891324 0.247812 0.012149 0.000186514 3.08333e-005 -
    3.48684e-007 0.00282324 0.00602135
    TABLE 2
    UNIT METER KN
    WIDE FLANGE
    300X300X87
    0.0111137 0.300237 0.00985337 0.297736 0.0141643 0.000189212 6.23289e-005 -
    6.11537e-007 0.00267922 0.00843444
    TABLE 3
    UNIT METER KN
    WIDE FLANGE
    W300X00X93KGM
    0.0117 0.3 0.01 0.3 0.015 0.000199328 6.75225e-005 7.65e-007 0.003 0.009
    END
    DEFINE MATERIAL START
    ISOTROPIC STEEL
    E 2.05e+008
    POISSON 0.3
    DENSITY 76.8195
    ALPHA 1.2e-005
    DAMP 0.03
    END DEFINE MATERIAL
    MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
    8 UPTABLE 1 350X250X69.2
    MEMBER PROPERTY BRITISH
    15 16 19 20 27 TO 29 32 TO 35 40 TABLE ST TUBE TH 0.005 WT 0.1 DT 0.1
    36 TO 39 TABLE ST UA50X50X5
    13 14 17 18 25 26 30 31 TABLE ST UC203X203X46
    MEMBER PROPERTY BRITISH
    1 TO 6 UPTABLE 3 W300X00X93KGM
    7 9 TO 12 TABLE ST TUBE TH 0.01 WT 0.28 DT 0.45
    CONSTANTS
    BETA 45 MEMB 36 TO 39
    BETA 90 MEMB 13 14 17 18
    MATERIAL STEEL ALL
    SUPPORTS
    3 4 7 8 PINNED
    MEMBER OFFSET
    13 TO 20 25 TO 40 START 0 -0.23 0
    13 TO 20 25 TO 40 END 0 -0.23 0
    ************************************************UNFACTORED LOADS
    LOAD 1 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE SELFWEIGHT
    SELFWEIGHT Y -1
    LOAD 2 LOADTYPE None TITLE UNFACTORED LOAD 1
    MEMBER LOAD
    9 CON GY -110.61 0.6455
    9 CON GZ -11.061 0.6455
    10 CON GY -110.61 0.4865
    10 CON GZ -11.061 0.4865
    LOAD 3 LOADTYPE None TITLE UNFACTORED LOAD 2
    JOINT LOAD
    1 FY -67.1
    LOAD 4 LOADTYPE None TITLE UNFACTORED LOAD 3
    JOINT LOAD
    5 FY -62.195
    LOAD 5 LOADTYPE None TITLE UNFACTORED LOAD 4
    MEMBER LOAD
    5 CON GY -117.03 0.8
    LOAD 6 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE UNFACTORED CABIN WEIGHT
    MEMBER LOAD
    30 31 UNI GY -3.4
    25 26 UNI GY -3.4 0 0.705
    **************************************************FACTORED LOADS
    LOAD 7 LOADTYPE None TITLE FACTORED LOAD 1
    REPEAT LOAD
    2 1.5
    LOAD 8 LOADTYPE None TITLE FACTORED LOAD 2
    REPEAT LOAD
    3 1.5
    LOAD 9 LOADTYPE None TITLE FACTORED LOAD 3
    REPEAT LOAD
    4 1.5
    LOAD 10 LOADTYPE None TITLE FACTORED LOAD 4
    REPEAT LOAD
    5 1.5
    LOAD 11 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE FACTORED LOAD 5
    REPEAT LOAD
    6 1.5
    LOAD COMB 12 SLS
    2 1.0 3 1.0 4 1.0 5 1.0 6 1.0
    LOAD COMB 13 ULS
    7 1.0 8 1.0 9 1.0 10 1.0 11 1.0
    PERFORM ANALYSIS



    LOAD LIST 12
    PARAMETER 1
    CODE EN 1993-1-1:2005
    SGR 1 ALL
    TRACK 2 ALL
    NA 7 ALL
    CHECK CODE ALL
    FINISH
  • Hi Geeky biswa,

    Yes that may be a big contributing factor for the sudden change in displacement but my follow up question is how does STAAD accounts for torsional constant in the calculation of deflection? Any reference? I'm currently going thru all the technical references as i need to provide a straight forward answer relating torsional stiffness in calculation of member displacement.

    Cheers,
    m.mac
  • The torsional constant is computed by the St. Venant principle.
    See the following discussion below that will explain your query.

    communities.bentley.com/.../274896



  • Hi,

    Thanks for pointing me on this article but the discussion pertains to "calculation of the torsional constant" and not "how torsional constant is accounted for the calculation of member displacement subject to torsion".


    Or should i say, how does torsional constant affects the calculation of member displacement subject to torsion? 

    Cheers,
    M.Mac

  • The calculation of rotation based on the Torsional stiffness is similar to the calculation of the displacent due to flexure and axial forces. Staad first solves the stiffness matrix to determine the 6 displacement like translation against X, Y and z, rotation about local X, Y and Z . Now, the corresponding forces like Fx, Fy ,Fz ,Mx ,My and MZ is determined based on the stiffness offered along those respective degree of freedom. Now in your model as the Torsional Constant for HSS is too high compared to the I shaped section, hence the corresponding rotation is also too low in case in HSS section. I don't see any problem in the displacement.



    Answer Verified By: Master Mac 

  • Hi Geeky,

    Thank you.

    When does STAAD calculates stiffness matrix based from torsional constant? Is it when we set TORSION parameter to other values than 0 or the usual/default assumption (TORSION 0) when a member is subjected to torsion only?

    I will be grateful if you can give me any reference or sample calculation that accounts for torsional rigidity for the calculation of rotation and displacement.

    Cheers,
    M.Mac
Reply
  • Hi Geeky,

    Thank you.

    When does STAAD calculates stiffness matrix based from torsional constant? Is it when we set TORSION parameter to other values than 0 or the usual/default assumption (TORSION 0) when a member is subjected to torsion only?

    I will be grateful if you can give me any reference or sample calculation that accounts for torsional rigidity for the calculation of rotation and displacement.

    Cheers,
    M.Mac
Children
No Data