RAM Concept - Mat Slab on grade - Reinforcement

I'm working on a mat slab on grade to support a silo at a concrete batch plant and wanted to model the slab in RAM Concept.

1. Our model for a slab on grade has flagged ACI318 section 7.12.  Per ACI318 section R7.12.1, this section is not for slabs-on-grade.  Why does RAM Concept check temperature and shrinkage reinforcement for a mat slab on grade, and is there a way to turn off this check?

2. Is there a way to change RAM's program assigned distributed reinforcement default output from number of bars to a bar spacing (without changing to user defined bar spacing)?

3. Is there a way to view/output the formulas and calculations (for a report), similar to RAM Connection's reports? 

Parents
  • 1. ACI 7.12 is included in the Code Minimum Designer for both Elevated and Mat Foundations. The application to mat foundations follows from ACI 10.5.4, which is also waived for soil-supported slabs. To disable this check, you can either delete the Code Minimum Rule Set or edit the span segments and set Code Minimum Reinforcement Location to "None." Both of these options will completely disable all code minimum reinforcement checks.

    2. Please see the frequently asked question, "How can I change the format of reinforcement on the Reinforcement Layer?" on the web page below for details:

    http://communities.bentley.com/products/structural/structural_analysis___design/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/8362

    3. Unfortunately, RAM Concept does not report detailed formulas like RAM Connection. The Cross Section Auditor in RAM Concept summarizes details of each design check. See Chapter 32 "Using the Auditor" in the RAM Concept Manual for more information on the Cross Section Auditor.



    Answer Verified By: Ryan Ankabrandt 

  • 1. I actually think now it's considered a "structural slab" per 10.5.4 and R10.5.4, so it does need checked for temperature and shrinkage reinforcement minimums. However, RAM Concept does not appear to be considering both layers (top and bottom of mat slab) for distribution of temperature and shrinkage reinforcement. Is there a way to check how the programs distributes temperature and shrinkage reinforcement between more than one layer?

    2. How is RAM Concept calculating the "USR"? With which ACI formulas? A simple hand calculation showed that our mat depth was ok, but the program has "Failed USR" for some fictitious columns we modeled on top of the mat for silo support base plates.
Reply
  • 1. I actually think now it's considered a "structural slab" per 10.5.4 and R10.5.4, so it does need checked for temperature and shrinkage reinforcement minimums. However, RAM Concept does not appear to be considering both layers (top and bottom of mat slab) for distribution of temperature and shrinkage reinforcement. Is there a way to check how the programs distributes temperature and shrinkage reinforcement between more than one layer?

    2. How is RAM Concept calculating the "USR"? With which ACI formulas? A simple hand calculation showed that our mat depth was ok, but the program has "Failed USR" for some fictitious columns we modeled on top of the mat for silo support base plates.
Children