Hi,
I have 2 questions:
1. If in the input for RSA we have Structural ductility, Structural performance, Importance factor then I presume scale X and Y shall be calculated automatically? So Scale x and y are really for 0.85 correction factor (correlation between dynamic and static shear)?
2. If I insert Scale X,Y=1 then I get excessive base shear forces (much higher than static) and still very small Mx and My values at the base (much lower than static). When I adjusted scale to be I/R (we don't have it in Australian standard but used it from ASCE as 1/4 for my building) - then I'm getting comparable base shear result to static analysis but still very low value for Mx and My.
Please advise
Also, it seems that shear distribution along the building is in different directions! See below:
Regarding the scale factor, what we usually tell people to do is scale the dynamic load by Ie/ R, then check the base shear and compare to the lower bound limit of .85* ELF approach, and re-scale if the dyn result is too low.
communities.bentley.com/.../ramss-dynamic-modal-analysis-faq.aspx
If only the dynamic loads show shear reversal (and static shears are as expected), then it's probably an issue of sign. There is an option to have the program consider sign in rsp analysis, which is based on the dominant mode, but it's sometimes simper just to ignore sign. If the shears are reversing for the static loads too, then that's another matter.
In the Ram Frame analysis manual (RamFrameAnalysis.pdf), in section 5.3.9 AS 1170.4-2007 we cover how the program has implemented the Response Spectra analysis for that code (and also how the equivalent static lateral force method is performed). The information there seems to match whet is in AS 1170.4-2007 Section 7 - DYNAMIC ANALYSIS. I don't see anything about scaling the dynamic analysis results in the code, so it probably should not be done.