Dear sir,
I designed one portal frame, even though i changed wind load from 2 kg/m to 5000kg/m. the utilization ratio does not change for rafter, but their is a changes in column. Please check the attached image and give the solution. Thanking you.
The ratios for member 1 and 2 were 0.025 when the applied wind load was 0.02 KN. The ratios changed for both columns to 0.918 when the wind load was increased to 50 KN.
For the member 3, the failure was due to slenderness as I already explained in my earlier post and so this ratio is independent of the load you apply. Hence ratio would not change even if you increase the load from 0.02 KN to 50 KN. You need to either bypass the slenderness check or use a bigger section to make it pass.
The 350 mm+ displacement I was referring to, was for the case when wind load was increased to 50 KN. The screenshot below shows that
Answer Verified By: Hamdan
Dear Mr. sye,
As you said i changed the support, and removed both taper 0 all & main 0 all. But still the member ratio is not changing. Even though im agree that the structure is not safe and failing in slenderness. why the ratio is not changing with vary in load accordingly. I attached the file plz edit and do necessary correction. 2818.Structure1.std
And plz screenshot the high x displacement of 358mm. Thanking you.
Dear Mr. Sye, Thanks for your reply. As im not well versed in structural analysis, Can you please check my staad file and correct it. As well i want to know if i build up this structure in site (Load are similar), is it safe?
Note: purpose of this structure is to lift any material by fixing chain hoist at center. (Though i didnt add this lifting load in this calculation, this lifting load i will add later)
8357.Structure1.std
Thanking you
From the screenshot I see that the rafter is failing in slenderness. For CODE AISC, slenderness is checked for any member prior to designing it for other cases and if the slenderness check fails, the Clause is reported as L/R-EXCEEDED. Since that condition remains same for both scenarios, your ratio is not changing. If you want to bypass the slenderness check for any particular member, you may assign the MAIN parameter to that member and set it to a value of 1.