<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>RAM SBeam v3.0</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/128967/ram-sbeam-v3-0</link><description>Hello - 
 
 My office still uses version 3.0 of RAM SBeam. When analyzing composite beams, I notice in the output that phi factor of 0.85 and 0.9 are used for flexure and shear, respectively. RAM SBeam v3.0 uses the 3rd Edition of AISC LRFD; however,</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: RAM SBeam v3.0</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/393432?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:29:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:2457938e-ebb6-44f0-83c2-b0faab25181f</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>Yes, that 0.85 value is from the LRFD 3rd edition which is the code you referenced in the first post. If you want to use other codes choose them under Criteria - Design. As noted in several other posts, we have yet to update SBeam for the 2010 code, however.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM SBeam v3.0</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/393422?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 19:00:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:6de376c1-083a-459e-a124-62b84bd89105</guid><dc:creator>Reginald Askew</dc:creator><description>In section I3.2(a) the phi factor is 0.9. Was this value different in the 3rd edition of AISC LRFD? It&amp;#39;s been 0.9 in the last two versions of AISC.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM SBeam v3.0</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/393420?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:56:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:af21961c-62b0-48ab-99f2-73d8c4a9d457</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>See section I3.2(a)&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM SBeam v3.0</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/393415?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:21:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:146b9288-009b-4cb0-bd70-6f1b09110e62</guid><dc:creator>Reginald Askew</dc:creator><description>Thank you. My apologies for the phi factor for shear; this is laid out in AISC.  However, I am trying to find reason for the flexure 0.85 factor for post-composite behavior.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM SBeam v3.0</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/393401?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:11:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:744e92ab-c81e-499d-b2c1-ac4477295b30</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In the LRFD third edition, the phi factor for beam shear is 0.9 (see section F2). It&amp;#39;s shown in the output report just in front of Vn in the Shear (ultimate) section.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For flexure, Phi can be 0.9 or 0.85 depending on the state (precomposite or post composite) and that&amp;#39;s also shown on the report in the Moments section.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/phi_5F00_lrfd_5F00_3.png"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/940x0/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/phi_5F00_lrfd_5F00_3.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>