Dear Friends,
STAAD considers the effect of concrete-slab in the calculations of member's stiffness which are a part of a composite deck, but what if some of these members which define the composite deck area need to be free and to exclude the concrete deck from stiffness calculations.
Rgards,
You can always manipulate the composite deck data using the input command file. For example if you would like to declare the beam 503 as non-composite, you can just delete that member number from the member list accompanying the COMPOSITE parameter and also comment out the related CW parameter as shown next
Answer Verified By: Khawaldah
Thank you, that works good but once I went back to the modeling and try to make some changes, the old data are restored, Is there any way to lock these changes.
another question:
I've Include the Dead load of composite deck slab in the load cases and assign concrete density to be 0.001 in the composite deck properties to avoide duplication in deck weight. am I right ? I noticed that the result of floor vibration increased tremendously.
does the concrete thickness above flutes means the concrete slab excluding rip thickness ?
Does Staad pro neglect the weight of rips in the calculations in general and in floor vibration as special case. because I get different results.
how could that be defferent when the rips run in perpendicular or in paralell to the joist direction.
Maybe I made a mistake by assigning floor deck for the whole area and it would be better if it is divided for three separated areas .
I've attached my model for clarification.
Regards,
4300.DAR08118-R0.std