Wind load generation on lattice towers

I have modeled an electric substation box-type structure which consists of lattice columns connected by struts made with standard shapes.  The lattice column longerons are L3X3 angles, laced together with L1-3/4X1-1/4X1/8 members.  I have calculated the force coefficient, Cf for latticed structures with flat sided members using the solidity ratio (phi) as given in ASCE 113 (pp. 39-40).  I applied one-half of the calculated load to each longeron as a uniform force, since the calculation is for one plane containing  two vertical members.  The same load was also applied to the "back side" angles.

To verify the application of wind loads using the wind load generator in STAAD, I defined the wind intensity using the same value as the hand calculation and applied the load to the same set of members.  One significant difference is that I included the lacing members in the STAAD generation, but this was not done in the hand calculation, since the solidity ratio was calculated with the lacing area included.  Therefore, the uniform load placed on the longeron should include the normal forces acting on the lacing.

All said, the STAAD loads are significantly higher than those calculated by hand and applied as uniform loads to the members.

I will provide the spreadsheet calculation of the force coefficients and the STAAD model if they will help explain the difference.

Thank you for your assistance.

 

Parents
  • Seems like you are using the Open Structure option when using the wind load generation in STAAD.Pro. Now if you are directly defining the intensity in STAAD.Pro and it is the same as in your hand calculations, then the only variable left is the projected area of the members normal to the wind. If you multiply the intensity by the depth of any member you should get the uniform loading on the member. Can you please check if you are able to match that value ? Also from the Statics Check Results table in the postprocessing mode, you would be able to check the total applied load for the Wind Load case in STAAD.Pro. You may want to see how that compares with the total load you are considering based on your hand calculations.



Reply
  • Seems like you are using the Open Structure option when using the wind load generation in STAAD.Pro. Now if you are directly defining the intensity in STAAD.Pro and it is the same as in your hand calculations, then the only variable left is the projected area of the members normal to the wind. If you multiply the intensity by the depth of any member you should get the uniform loading on the member. Can you please check if you are able to match that value ? Also from the Statics Check Results table in the postprocessing mode, you would be able to check the total applied load for the Wind Load case in STAAD.Pro. You may want to see how that compares with the total load you are considering based on your hand calculations.



Children
  • I misstated the relative difference of the calculated forces in the original statement. The STAAD results are significantly lower (not higher as originally stated) than the forces calculated using the guidance in ASCE 113 and ASCE 7-05. I have checked the sum results and the applied loads vs. the reactions are equal.
    I will continue to evaluate the system using the hand generated wind forces, but would like to know why STAAD is some 40% lower when calculating the wind forces on open structures than the method presented in the standards.
  • One thing that may explain the difference is the input statement in STAAD does not account for the shape factor applied to structural members, which is given as 2.0 in ASCE 113, Table 3-9 for squares and rectangles. If the factor is set to 2.0 in the STAAD input file, the results in very good agreement.

    LOAD 21 WIND X-AUTO
    WIND LOAD X 2.0 TYPE 2 OPEN LIST 1 TO 88 101 TO 188 201 TO 288 -