<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Beam utility for each load comb</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/133678/beam-utility-for-each-load-comb</link><description>Dear Moderator, 
 
 Is it possible to see utility ratio of the beam for each load combination not just for the worst case? 
 
 Regards,</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Beam utility for each load comb</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/408293?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 16:48:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4eae9e9e-3832-4ddc-a2af-e3801a0ef120</guid><dc:creator>Sye</dc:creator><description>Here is a wiki on the same topic &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/products/structural/structural_analysis___design/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/18198.how-to-get-design-utilization-ratio-for-each-load-case"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../18198.how-to-get-design-utilization-ratio-for-each-load-case&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Enhancement requests #251152 &amp;amp; #251797 are in our system and this is a high priority item in the list of future developments being considered for STAAD.Pro.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Beam utility for each load comb</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/408289?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 16:16:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4f42448a-66a3-4d60-b574-844eb1e99cf9</guid><dc:creator>Tank</dc:creator><description>This has been on my wish list for a long time. What Modestas suggest is really not very practical.  Maybe now that there are two of us who would like to see this they will add this enhancement. It&amp;#39;s been awhile since I&amp;#39;ve used SACS but if I remember right it does this so they have the technology.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Beam utility for each load comb</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/408255?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 12:55:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4ef56d91-9470-4791-8b73-f4cab9ee3d3c</guid><dc:creator>Modestas</dc:creator><description>You would need to use a LOAD LIST command with the load number following by CHECK CODE command for each load case. I.e.:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PARAMETER 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{Design Code}&lt;br /&gt;
{Design parameters}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LOAD LIST 1&lt;br /&gt;
CHECK CODE ALL&lt;br /&gt;
LOAD LIST 2&lt;br /&gt;
CHECK CODE ALL&lt;br /&gt;
LOAD LIST 3&lt;br /&gt;
CHECK CODE ALL&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will see the design results for each load case (1, 2 and 3) separately in the Output file. Note that only the results from the last code check are reported in the Postprocessing table.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>