I'm designing a mat supported on piles in Concept. I exported the model and the loads from RSS, but now I'm trying to model the piles. In the past, I've used a point spring to represent the piles. My spring constant was always Ks=P/Delta, or the pile capacity divided by the expected settlement of the pile. However, I would like to use an equivalent column to be able to check for punching shear in my current model. To do so, I'm using the spring equations of Ks=AE/L and Ks=P/Delta. Since I have a pile size (18" dia), a pile capacity (400 kips), and expected settlement (<1/4"), I have a spring constant I can assume for my model (400kips / 0.25in = 1,600Kips/in). To find an equivalent column, I believe I simply have to solve for L in the other spring equation. Since A is based on my pile diameter, and E on my concrete strength, solving for L should give me the column length representative of what my spring constant is. Running the numbers, I end up with an 18" dia round column with a length equal to 47.8ft. I then set the columns under the mat and run the model as if it was an elevated slab.
I believe I also have to make the columns "Compressible". Design strips will span between columns, similar to elevated slabs.
Is this the right approach to model piles as columns?
In RAM Concept, all column and wall reaction are at the slab and not the bottom of the member. You will need to add in the column/pile self-weight.
The slab self-weight is included and would be factored using the load factor defined for the Self-Dead Loading defined with the load combination.
Seth,
Is there a caveat in assuming point support instead of spring support to mimic a helical pile?
Thank you!
Point supports are rigid, while springs are flexible, but that's all.
Ok! Thanks for a speedy response!!