Step in Slab in RAM Concept

I'm looking at a podium slab with a 6" step in the top of slab (constant soffit across the step) for a topping slab in a courtyard area. We added a 75psf area DL in the 6" recessed area to account for the topping slab weight and get the following bottom stress plan (distributed tendons running L-R):

For a number of reasons, the step in the slab needed to move to right by a few feet. I adjusted the area DL to match the new step location. So, the loading is essentially the same in the area with the thicker structural slab being adjusted to extend further into the courtyard. This produced a large jump in the bottom stresses:

Is there a reason for this? The loading isn't any different aside from some of the DL shifting from the "other dead loading" to self weight, and with the CS inter cross section slope limit set to 0.25 you have the same design strip section at the new step location as you did when the step was located further to the left.

Parents Reply Children
  • The sections to the left are thicker, so the stress there is lower, that much makes sense.  There is a pretty big difference in depth between the sections at the step and the next section over (due to wide spacing of sections), hence the seemingly sudden change in stress.  If you had more sections with a gradual change in depth it would not look like such a spike.

    At the step the bottom stress is now higher, but not that much higher (about 100 psi). My theory is that moving the step changed the stiffness and the behavior shifting the moment diagram slightly, plus the axial compression stress from the tendons is less.