<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Connection design with beams on both side flanges</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/146852/connection-design-with-beams-on-both-side-flanges</link><description>Hello Seth, 
 Is it possible to design a moment connection as attached below in RAM, 
 
 Of course considering reactions and moments from both side beams (on flange and most imp on web of column)? 
 Is it possible with Eurocode? 
 Or we do it only for</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Connection design with beams on both side flanges</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/447804?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 07:26:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:80f0324d-1336-483d-a398-edadf0ae132f</guid><dc:creator>Vishal Girase</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I certainly think so.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i&amp;#39;ll let you know, if i could find anything.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Connection design with beams on both side flanges</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/447553?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:27:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:fd418c6d-5113-45c9-a6da-449fc89cd99d</guid><dc:creator>Jason McCool</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I would assume Eurocode would address those limit states as well, though maybe by a different name....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Connection design with beams on both side flanges</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/446767?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 03:28:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:812c5c1a-4012-4280-ab72-a22c8cfbc7c3</guid><dc:creator>Vishal Girase</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Jason,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the additional information, I will keep this in mind while working with AISC.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Connection design with beams on both side flanges</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/446671?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:18:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:73e5bda3-333d-4dfd-b52c-a87af429f109</guid><dc:creator>Jason McCool</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not sure about EC, but under the AISC calcs, forces input for the opposite connection on a column strong-axis are used for panel zone shear in the column web when the moments are additive (i.e. wind/seismic) and for web compression buckling when the flanges forces are counteracting (i.e. gravity load moments). Just keep an eye on cases where you have different depth beams.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Connection design with beams on both side flanges</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/446529?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 10:19:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:830fed69-4c12-40f2-8356-3c2c2ed27158</guid><dc:creator>Vishal Girase</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Seth,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
[quote userid="7778" url="~/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/146852/connection-design-with-beams-on-both-side-flanges/446486"]This flag is used to assume only the half of the web thickness of the support for the bolt bearing verification in BCW connections.[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Then what is the use of specifying forces for opposite connection in moment type of connection?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Connection design with beams on both side flanges</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/446486?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 18:52:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e95e83f8-20e8-4726-a392-237381aab32f</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You can enter the left beam size and forces in addition to the right, but the connection program is looking at one side of the connection only. You may note the help for the parameter &amp;quot;Exists opposite connection&amp;quot; says:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table width="100%"&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div style="border-bottom:windowtext 0.5pt solid;padding:1pt 4pt 1pt 4pt;"&gt;
&lt;p class="heading_1" align="left"&gt;Opposite Connection&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="justify"&gt;Flag that shows if there is another beam attached to the support in the opposite side with a similar connection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="justify"&gt;This flag is used to assume only the half of the web thickness of the support for the bolt bearing verification in BCW connections.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>