<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>PT through Slab Step and Upturned Beam</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/158771/pt-through-slab-step-and-upturned-beam</link><description>Ram Concept community, 
 I have a question regarding the correct modeling practices for a PT two-way slab with a significant step. 
 In my particular case, my slab step is occurring at mid-span perpendicular to my bundled tendons, and I have upturned</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: PT through Slab Step and Upturned Beam</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/473631?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 18:38:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:27635ac8-016f-42d0-945c-07934a96b4b6</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve seen Ram Concept models with PT terminating at two different elevations within a beam or step.&amp;nbsp; The important thing to be aware of is that racking deformation of the beam section is not considered due to the assumption that &amp;quot;plane sections remain plane&amp;quot;. Refer to the program manual - Analysis Notes for details. Keeping the perpendicular design strips clear of the step is also advised.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>