<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>RAM Elements - Rectangular Bar Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/168374/ram-elements---rectangular-bar-design</link><description>Looking into modeling up a curved steel stair stringer made out of flat plate (including welded steel plate treads). In doing so, I&amp;#39;ve got discreet members that run from the ground to the landing that I was hoping to model up as a plate section (say 3</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: RAM Elements - Rectangular Bar Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/774252?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 19:30:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b0a3de03-97cd-4cd4-a90c-d7bcda82d591</guid><dc:creator>Nik</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Seth! I had overlooked the option.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM Elements - Rectangular Bar Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/773641?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 13:44:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b2a7c157-1e7c-401f-8acd-96102220a1f4</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I probably used the RectBar section template. For more see:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/3569/creating-custom-sections-materials-etc-in-ram-elements-tn"&gt;Creating custom Sections, Materials etc. in RAM Elements [TN]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM Elements - Rectangular Bar Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/773523?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 22:54:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:085a71fc-4686-4301-8f2b-9715e0d01422</guid><dc:creator>Nik</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;May I please learn how&amp;nbsp; you managed to model the rectangular bar section?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM Elements - Rectangular Bar Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/482684?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:58:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d5390f39-3da1-4a87-8536-18c199dfda36</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, the expectation is that height is the larger dimension. I now remember this came up once before.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM Elements - Rectangular Bar Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/482683?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:52:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:6670530e-78ea-4e19-a1e3-df05aaf86da6</guid><dc:creator>Nulukkizdin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry - the version I sent had the wrong member orientation (was oriented such that 1&amp;quot; was the depth).&amp;nbsp;The original orientation (8&amp;quot; as the depth) still produces the same issue. These were all based on a section property with a height of 1&amp;quot; and a widthof 8&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That said, changing the section property such that the height is 8&amp;quot; and the width is 1&amp;quot; produces the correct result no matter what the orientation is in the model. It appears that for the slenderness checks it will use t = width and d = height no matter what the orientation of loading, correct? Either way, I think that does the trick - thanks!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM Elements - Rectangular Bar Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/482682?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:43:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:45e9e754-c9eb-4e20-8cd2-67a90588f565</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Try inverting the section such that height is 8&amp;quot;, and width is 1&amp;quot;. You can rotate the members 90 degrees to keep the same analytical model.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM Elements - Rectangular Bar Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/482681?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:41:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:4a861088-1226-4e68-acae-a09796410c1b</guid><dc:creator>Nulukkizdin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Emailed it to you to check out - thanks for looking.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM Elements - Rectangular Bar Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/482678?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:29:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a737a790-8faa-4d74-b642-a1a5c24eb41a</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If you save your file (as a zip with custom data included) and send me that I can check it in v15 quickly.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM Elements - Rectangular Bar Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/482677?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:23:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8fdceef8-daba-476f-898c-45345e11bfa5</guid><dc:creator>Nulukkizdin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the response! When I put in your 12&amp;quot; tall , 1/4&amp;quot; thick plate I do actually see some results. When I had run my previous section, I was only seeing the yield failure mode checked (no LTB). I agree that your member should be checked for LTB (so that checks out), but technically my section meets the criteria meets the criteria in F11.2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my example Lb = 12&amp;quot;,&amp;nbsp;d&amp;nbsp;= 8&amp;quot;, t= 1&amp;quot;, E = 29000 ksi, Fy = 36 ksi. Checking (L_b*d)/(t^2)&amp;nbsp;I get a ratio of 96. Comparing this to 0.08*E/F_y (value of 64), I see that 96 is greater than 64 and thus I need to check LTB per (F11-2). When I go into my results, though, I&amp;#39;m only seeing the yield checks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ve currently got version 14 installed, so I&amp;#39;ll look into see if upgrading to 15 changes anything here quick.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM Elements - Rectangular Bar Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/482675?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:04:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9ac9016b-b742-4bd0-ae2b-8e883032e47f</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is some steel design output from version 15.00.00.18 for AISC 360-10 LRFD design using a 12&amp;quot; tall, 1/4&amp;quot; thick plate with major-axis moment only.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/480x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/re_5F00_fb_5F00_out.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is this different from what you are getting? What version and design code are you using?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>