<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>RAM SS Gravity Column Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/176935/ram-ss-gravity-column-design</link><description>The gravity column design interaction equation H1-1a in RAM SS does not account for the Mux/(0.9Mnx) in the unity equation. Why is that ?</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: RAM SS Gravity Column Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/512582?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 17:36:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:69a88c7c-cac2-404f-8d54-39b6f06a341b</guid><dc:creator>Karthik Madhur</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you Seth yes I saw that earlier the column was controlled by Eqn H1-2 and it gave a DCR of 0.902. But that happened because Eqn H1-1a did not consider Mrx/Mcx (which comes to around 0.15) in the equation and if added to 0.819 (Pr/Pc) it would give a higher DCR. Please let me know if otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM SS Gravity Column Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/512581?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 17:31:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:68b74036-04f0-4b3c-96ff-d9567f843262</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Make sure you go to the next page of the report, it&amp;#39;s actually Eq H1-2 that controls here.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you reduce your report margins you can get it all on one sheet.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/h1_2D00_2.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a further test I set the minor axis eccentricity for column 3B at L12 to 19&amp;quot; and then the program reports H1-1a controls (and the column fails).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I still have to check into why the alternate condition of using Mrx/Mcx vs. Mry/Mcy is not reported here.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM SS Gravity Column Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/512574?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:52:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:626e4bd1-afe1-4e4d-90a8-290de378656c</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="/help/w/be_communities_help/7079.be-communities-secure-file-upload.aspx" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;Secure File Upload&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM SS Gravity Column Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/512573?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:51:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d320da47-c3e2-4227-8f02-8d9bc6952a50</guid><dc:creator>Karthik Madhur</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, it is controlled by H1.3 but still the H1-1a equation is used to determine the limit state of in-plane instability but I couldn&amp;#39;t see ratio of Mux/ Mcx being considered in the equation, it just considers the Muy/Mcy (which it can ignore). I can send the file over please let me know how can I upload? Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM SS Gravity Column Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/512571?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:41:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:1fd10b5c-7411-4ab0-bedf-288b65d6c597</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#39;s what the 2010 code says (note 2016 is slightly revised)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/400x400/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/h1pt3.png" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I believe you are in the rare case where the moment is primarily about the major axis,&amp;nbsp;and the minor axis moments are small enough that you qualify for the use of H1.3 yet the minor axis moments end up controlling.&amp;nbsp; To confirm you can adjust the eccentricity to see at what point the Mry is more than 5% of Mcy and the program will go back to using H1.1a.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or you can send your file over and I can confirm. I was not able to build a test case that produced this output so far.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM SS Gravity Column Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/512555?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 15:58:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3ef9afd7-4623-48cb-b13a-d82a4e4b3e49</guid><dc:creator>Karthik Madhur</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Seth I&amp;#39;m currently using AISC 360-2010 LRFD, and the RAM version is 16.00.01.06 CL&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM SS Gravity Column Design</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/512551?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 15:54:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:0ec69cff-4dbc-4da3-842a-9d652d85c126</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What design code year are you using, AISC 360 - 2016?&amp;nbsp; What version of Ram Steel? There have been changes to this approach over the years.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>