<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Period for multiple diaphragms in Model</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/179879/period-for-multiple-diaphragms-in-model</link><description>How does RAM calculate the period for a building that has separated diaphragms. Attached is an image of two towers that are connected on the bottom three floors and then are separate the rest of the way up.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Period for multiple diaphragms in Model</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/523102?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 16:27:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:416472de-ea2f-40c3-934e-8ccbeb776737</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If you perform the eigenvalue analysis you can report or graphical animate the mode shapes. You should see some modes for the separate towers moving independently.&amp;nbsp; We determine the dominant mode based on mass participation, so the program will probably use a reasonable mode shape for T is static seismic loads, but you can always over ride the T if there is another mode shape you want to be considered for the period.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For towers with radically different dynamic behavior, some users want one T used for one tower and another T used for the other tower. That&amp;#39;s not currently possible short of splitting the model into two parts, or using user defined story forces.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>