https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/180932/one-way-load---not-matching-with-the-orientation-of-member-assignedDear Colleagues, I happened to open an STAAD file modeled using the previous version, but when opened in my CONNECT Edition 21.03.00.146, i noticed that ONE way loading diagram assigned to a set of beam&#39;s FLOOR group, diagram doesn&#39;t seem to match asen-USTelligent Community 12https://communities.bentley.com/thread/527606?ContentTypeID=1Sat, 15 Jun 2019 05:05:01 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:2a976f54-2620-4aa0-afd0-67fc34ef9c86Dani Paul<p>thanks for the info, Sye.... I&#39;ll keep in mind to apply apply the floor loads on beams using the conventional approach - to play safe...</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/527371?ContentTypeID=1Thu, 13 Jun 2019 22:31:08 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:78a4ed46-fa7a-4240-8695-94ac6141a7f2Sye<p>It is actually loading the members in the opposite direction for the floor group _ROOF_SOUTH_WEST when the TOWARDS option is used. I will have to refer this to our development desk. For now what you can do is, take out the TOWARDS 580 option by changing&nbsp;</p> <p>_ROOF_SOUTH_WEST ONE -2.93 GY TOWARDS 580</p> <p>to</p> <p>_ROOF_SOUTH_WEST ONE -2.93 GY</p> <p>and this would get the right beams loaded</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/527182?ContentTypeID=1Thu, 13 Jun 2019 05:01:25 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ea433e70-136b-4797-a084-0f4e28ec7223Dani Paul<p>&nbsp;Sure Sye, please find attached...</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/527101?ContentTypeID=1Wed, 12 Jun 2019 17:05:32 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:0ef6b506-e546-48f4-b376-3d1bcf201d08Sye<p>Please upload the .std file.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>