<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Beam to column flange connection with Haunch Checks</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/181366/beam-to-column-flange-connection-with-haunch-checks</link><description>When applying compression force only in a beam to column moment connection, RAM applies the complete compression force to the flange of the haunch only. Moreover, it considers the flange as a slender plate not welded to the web. 
 My question is: 
 1</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Beam to column flange connection with Haunch Checks</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/663942?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 07:28:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:49379244-5b74-4e93-9676-800641ce316a</guid><dc:creator>Raviraj Swami</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Complete Haunch design calculation&amp;nbsp;provided by RAM connection needs to be corrected.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="/members/74c179f0_2d00_3743_2d00_43f7_2d00_9188_2d00_f87b8f5cf14a"&gt;Seth Guthrie&lt;/a&gt; Could you verify this as per AISC DG 12 procedure?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Beam to column flange connection with Haunch Checks</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/663933?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 07:13:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:67b6e6bc-5716-4d7b-8a48-f6678d2de178</guid><dc:creator>Raviraj Swami</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It seems demand calculation in RAM connection is incorrect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AISC DG 12 example 6.3 gives how only area of haunch flange is effective considering strut action of haunch flange.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bentley needs to look into it &amp;amp; take corrective action.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/tags/bug" class="tag hash-tag" data-tags="bug"&gt;#bug&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/tags/error" class="tag hash-tag" data-tags="error"&gt;#error&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/members/74c179f0_2d00_3743_2d00_43f7_2d00_9188_2d00_f87b8f5cf14a"&gt;Seth Guthrie&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Beam to column flange connection with Haunch Checks</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/529049?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:19:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:94861f45-7b5e-4907-b8e5-eefdba18b519</guid><dc:creator>Shady Abdelmessih</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am aware of this option and Unchecking it means taking off the complete check which my question is based on.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Beam to column flange connection with Haunch Checks</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/528944?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2019 08:05:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:daf7712f-8e82-4960-9909-0ab2c23a3020</guid><dc:creator>Abhisek M</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I can see in your file you have checked the following option.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1561277114125v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can you please uncheck it and see if you are getting expected results?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>