<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Addition of beam at deck edge</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/182027/addition-of-beam-at-deck-edge</link><description>Hi, I&amp;#39;m getting different results if I don&amp;#39;t add a beam at the edge of the deck where it switches to a different one vs if I add a beam at the same location. The loads going into to the column is different. Could you please let me know? I could send in</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Addition of beam at deck edge</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/530933?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 21:52:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:8f3cc0e8-0bb3-4654-ac82-f4d11b0364d1</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Not exactly. Load from any portion of the slab that is recognized as the &amp;quot;slab overhang&amp;quot; is applied to the adjacent perimeter beam, regardless of deck orientation. It&amp;#39;s only within the limits of the framing that the program&amp;nbsp;uses deck orientation for tributary load determination. That&amp;#39;s why this topic comes up: &lt;a title="Click to view the page titled: Missing or incorrect loads on perimeter beams" href="/products/structural/structural_analysis___design/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/18040.missing-or-incorrect-loads-on-perimeter-beams"&gt;Missing or incorrect loads on perimeter beams&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Addition of beam at deck edge</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/530932?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 21:48:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:75aa3976-8c76-4464-b0ae-7e55cb056754</guid><dc:creator>Karthik Madhur</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Seth, thanks! But we are spanning the deck in the same direction/ orientation we are adding the beam. So the load should be distributed to the outer beams regardless in both the cases. Please let me know.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Addition of beam at deck edge</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/530925?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2019 21:21:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:830f5604-b651-443c-b7f3-52a468c59fc5</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If it&amp;#39;s one-way deck, hen adding a beam certainly changed the tributary area, the loads to the beam, etc. Check into these tech notes:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="/Products/Structural/Structural_Analysis___Design/w/Structural_Analysis_and_Design__Wiki/ramss-two-way-decks.aspx"&gt;RAMSS Two Way Decks&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="/products/structural/structural_analysis___design/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/ram-ss-common-framing-table-errors-tn.aspx"&gt;RAMSS Common Framing Table Errors&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a title="Click to view the page titled: Missing or incorrect loads on perimeter beams" href="/products/structural/structural_analysis___design/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/18040.missing-or-incorrect-loads-on-perimeter-beams"&gt;Missing or incorrect loads on perimeter beams&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a title="Click to view the page titled: Failed to Create Slab Edge load Polygons" href="/products/structural/structural_analysis___design/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/21778.failed-to-create-slab-edge-load-polygons"&gt;Failed to Create Slab Edge load Polygons&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>