<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Required Strength for EBF Column</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/184692/required-strength-for-ebf-column</link><description>I am designing 3-story Eccentric Brace Frames using the Seismic Provisions in RAM Frame and I am confused with the required strength value that is being determined for the axial design of the 1st story column. 
 The Member Code Check report for the column</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Required Strength for EBF Column</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/540786?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 21:46:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7bf0490a-adff-44e1-a0df-6cf25f57159c</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Without actually going thru old models I would guess that BRBFs are becoming popular. Special Moment frames (with or without Side Plates) and Special Concentrically Braced Frames too.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Required Strength for EBF Column</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/540781?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 21:09:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:32dbaea3-aee1-427b-8f23-8986ee055b05</guid><dc:creator>John Gervais</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Personally, this would be my first EBF design, so I am digging extra deep into the analysis and design process that RAM uses to engineer them. In doing so, I have been using an EBF design spreadsheet created and verified by our senior seismic engineer and back checking the results that RAM has been producing. In general, RAM has been producing more efficient results, aside from this column design issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From an engineering standpoint, it seems like it would be rather simple to adjust the design check in RAM to consider the actual adjusted shear strength values of the link beams in the stories above instead of relying on&amp;nbsp;the application of an amplification factor under assumed conditions. However, from a computer software standpoint, this may well be a much harder process to execute.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the last few years, our office has been doing a number of steel-framed buildings on the West Coast in high-seismic areas. For these projects, a lot of them had building characteristics that best suited the use of EBFs versus other seismic systems. Until now, we have been using a combination&amp;nbsp;ETABS and&amp;nbsp;spreadsheets to design the lateral system for these structures, but after reviewing the seismic analysis and design capabilities of RAM Frame, I wanted to try it out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In general, do you see many models for projects with lateral systems for high-seismic areas? What sort of systems have they been using? Are their structures just naturally better suited for systems other than EBF, or are they using other systems in lieu of&amp;nbsp;EBFs?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Required Strength for EBF Column</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/540779?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:22:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ff030d63-8204-4320-b93b-c1975ab3beb9</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What you are saying is correct and our approach is an oversimplification of the design. An enhancement is needed, but it&amp;#39;s rather complex to execute.&amp;nbsp; Do you do a lot of EBF designs?&amp;nbsp; Just based on the models I see from users, they seem to be less common now.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>