<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>RAM Steel Beam Web Opening</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/191254/ram-steel-beam-web-opening</link><description>In RAM SS, Beam gravity module. I am analyzing some web openings in the beam. The beam is designed as a composite beam. But the opening paramter, po, is checked against 5.6 ( recommended for steel section per AISC Design Guide #2)? Do you know the reason</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: RAM Steel Beam Web Opening</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/564608?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:39:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b84a8cb5-8f32-4673-b514-530b1f22b73f</guid><dc:creator>Karl G</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If the deck is not shored (as indicated in the report), then the beam supports load in a non-composite state and the more stringent limit would apply.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>