<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Floor Diaphgram and Moment Release</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/198330/floor-diaphgram-and-moment-release</link><description>1) After applying floor diaphgram i am getting following warning 
 *WARNING- ZERO STIFFNESS IN DIRECTION 2 AT JOINT 32 EQN.NO. 188 
 ***WARNING - INSTABILITY AT JOINT 980 DIRECTION = MY 
 2) Have i applied the moment release correctly . I do not want</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Floor Diaphgram and Moment Release</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/591054?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 19:42:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:7d8f831b-06b1-410c-92a8-718de330edf8</guid><dc:creator>Anurag Tripathi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for reply sir&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How to remove the warning related to instability at joint direction = MX MZ FX FZ&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Floor Diaphgram and Moment Release</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/591042?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 18:33:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:6f4144fb-4cb3-4a36-b0a0-18ff0a1ad69e</guid><dc:creator>Sye</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I took a very quick look at the model and noted some improper releases at nodes like say 31, 32, 33 &amp;hellip;. You have applied MZ releases to ALL members connecting at these nodes. You should only release the MZ for the supported members whereas the main supporting members (like 46 to 53 for example)should not have these releases as these beams should behave as a continuous member. Check other locations where you may have the same issue. Please get these fixed before getting into the design phase. I did not see an issue with the wind load generation as such.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>