i am getting such a big dimension in column design in rcdc software.
SIR BUT I GET VERY LESS PT% FOR ANY COLUMN EVEN LESS THAN 1% WHICH IS NOT ECONOMICAL SUGGEST ME TO INCREASE THE PT%.
I think I answered in your one post related to IS13920 2016 code implementation. I can see most of the failures are in joint check. There is a document you may refer to know how this is being calculated and understand the effect of it in sizes.
https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/44014/column-beam-joint-check-validation-document_5f00_is-13920-2016
AISHWARIYA1.STD5661.New folder.zip
can you please upload the RCDC and STAAD file here? Also let us know the expected value as per your calculation/understanding.