Staad Plant Foundation: Why footing size too large by using IS code?; While US code give appropriate size!https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/199699/staad-plant-foundation-why-footing-size-too-large-by-using-is-code-while-us-code-give-appropriate-size1) Please Suggest modification, correction in my Staad Foundation file, for since I am Getting very large sizes in (approx Twice in Plan, 20 time in thickness). a) Used IS code /IS 456, Si units, compared with US code SI units, Code ACI 318 -14 b) Loadsen-USTelligent Community 12RE: Staad Plant Foundation: Why footing size too large by using IS code?; While US code give appropriate size!https://communities.bentley.com/thread/598194?ContentTypeID=1Wed, 15 Jul 2020 02:24:39 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:07615de6-8bb3-47b9-8938-a3d0d90792b6Kris Sathia<p>We acknowledge that the footing size calculated for the Indian code seems unreasonably large. The next version will have the correction for this.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>RE: Staad Plant Foundation: Why footing size too large by using IS code?; While US code give appropriate size!https://communities.bentley.com/thread/596042?ContentTypeID=1Thu, 02 Jul 2020 09:27:25 GMT6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:2f836787-981a-4dad-a35e-9f57806fa2baKris Sathia<p>We are looking into this&nbsp;and will get back to you.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>