<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Member offset consideration in Model</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/200168/member-offset-consideration-in-model</link><description>Dear Experts. 
 What does it mean Member offset Command Consideration in Model?</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Member offset consideration in Model</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/597589?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 22:33:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:ffd74ed5-bee0-43d3-a0d9-e2cd6cd3c0c9</guid><dc:creator>Sye</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Member offsets are used to account for any extra forces/moments resulting from member/element centers&amp;nbsp;not being aligned. A typical example is when you have a beam supporting a deck.&amp;nbsp;Typically in an analytical model, you would model with beam and&amp;nbsp;plates at&amp;nbsp;the same elevation or in other words having the centers at the same level. However in reality the beam&amp;nbsp;center line would be at a certain offset with respect to the&amp;nbsp;center of the deck and that&amp;nbsp;effect can be modeled by applying offsets to the start and end of the beam members. Applying offsets along the member local x axis to the start and end of beams and braces, to&amp;nbsp;cut these off at the face of their respective supporting members, are other instances where offsets are also typically used.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>