Some members of BCF, BCW and BG CONNECTION template are not being assigned?

Question

Dear Sir, 
 I am having trouble designing some of the connections.I have also grouped the unassigned / undersigned members as BCF, BCW & BG for the first floor only. Please show me how to avoid it and design these members. 
 40.rar

Modestas · Answer

It seems that connection design module is not supporting the Indian NPB sections. If you change it to Jindal NPB, the design should run fine.

Modestas · Answer

Nodes 4, 60 and 98 are a beam to column connection, not a beam girder connection. I see that the remaining nodes which you mentioned do have a beam girder connections assigned and designed.

Modestas · Answer

It is enough to have a single BG connection at the single node. If beam and girder members are identify correctly, the results at both BG connection in the same node should be the same. You can check how beam and girder members are identified by clicking on the 'Identify Beam and Girder' icon in the menu.

Modestas · Answer

Make sure that the girder beam is the same member at both BG connections at node 1781. This can be done by using a 'Identify Beam and Girder' tool. Once this is done, both BG connections at node 1781 will have the same ratio.

Modestas · Answer

Please see the screenshot below. As you can see, at node 1781, member 5445 is considered as a Girder in your model. This is not correct, I believe, as member 5445 should be considered as a Beam and members 70 and 4921 should be considered as a Girder. So if you swap beam and girder at these connections using this tool, the utilization ratio of both connections becomes the same, so one of those can be deleted.