<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>RAM Structural System - Load Bearing Walls supported on Concrete One-way Deck</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/204578/ram-structural-system---load-bearing-walls-supported-on-concrete-one-way-deck</link><description>Hello, 
 I&amp;#39;ve modeled some load bearing walls (CFMF stud walls in reality but modeled as concrete walls with an equivalent thickness to capture weight) which support a metal deck (concrete topped) for several typical levels. These load bearing walls are</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: RAM Structural System - Load Bearing Walls supported on Concrete One-way Deck</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/614701?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2020 18:51:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:77d4d515-7bee-4ec6-8754-35d71d5093e5</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#39;s consistent with what you want, and probably fine for gravity walls above. If the walls above that transfer are modeled as lateral walls, then the diaphragm out-of-plane stiffness for lateral loads ought to be considered too. See this:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/products/structural/structural_analysis___design/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/18616.ram-frame-criteria-diaphragms#two-way"&gt;https://communities.bentley.com/products/structural/structural_analysis___design/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/18616.ram-frame-criteria-diaphragms#two-way&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM Structural System - Load Bearing Walls supported on Concrete One-way Deck</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/614700?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2020 18:25:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:fc6731e7-20fa-40d3-b43c-b8bd3e4408ea</guid><dc:creator>Alejandro Alvergue</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Seth. I have changed those transfer slabs to &amp;quot;two-way&amp;quot; and now the reactions at the column I was checking, match pretty close to my calculations.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regarding out of plane stiffness for a two-way slab. Note #3 under the one-way and two-way deck table (first link you provided) says&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;span&gt;The diaphragm will always be meshed, and out-of-plane stiffness will always be assumed under gravity loads.&amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;This is fine for the gravity load cases, but when running lateral analysis (wind) in RAM Frame, and keeping all diaphragms as rigid, I would not want to include out of plate stiffness.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Your second link, mentions:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;quot;For any transfer slab the&amp;nbsp;&lt;strong&gt;out-of-plane stiffness should be considered when analyzing lateral load cases&lt;/strong&gt;.&amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Though in RAM Frame, under Criteria&amp;gt;Diaphragm, I have purposely&amp;nbsp;left the last box unchecked under &amp;quot;Include Out-of-Plane Stifness&amp;quot; so I would hope this stays true when the lateral analysis is run. Could you verify this?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/Screenshot-2020_2D00_10_2D00_16-132245.png" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RAM Structural System - Load Bearing Walls supported on Concrete One-way Deck</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/614670?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2020 15:35:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:5177f628-ae45-4be3-9b2d-7d55644c89bd</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If the supporting deck is 2-way, then it gets meshed with and will support the walls above. If the deck is one way then there needs to be a beam (or wall) below the walls above to work. See also:&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/products/ram-staad/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/3262/ramss-two-way-decks-tn"&gt;https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/3262/ramss-two-way-decks-tn&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="/products/ram-staad/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/10202/modeling-podium-slabs"&gt;https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/10202/modeling-podium-slabs&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>