<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>FLOOR LOAD NOT GENERATING CORRECTLY WITH GROUPING IN CONNECT EDITION, WHERE AS OLDER VERSION OF STAAD PRO V8I SS6 IS TAKING CORRECTLY</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/215873/floor-load-not-generating-correctly-with-grouping-in-connect-edition-where-as-older-version-of-staad-pro-v8i-ss6-is-taking-correctly</link><description>Whenever using Grouping for end wall columns for wind loads and applying one-way distribution the loads are taken incorrectly, 
 I have attached the staad model showing the problem with connect edition, also when the same model is opened through an older</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: FLOOR LOAD NOT GENERATING CORRECTLY WITH GROUPING IN CONNECT EDITION, WHERE AS OLDER VERSION OF STAAD PRO V8I SS6 IS TAKING CORRECTLY</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/657894?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 09:33:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:45866909-783f-468c-8553-3de7e45eaedc</guid><dc:creator>Senthilvela Devaraj</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;we are dealing with complex structures, applying as member loads is a cumbersome process when comes to load application on structures, this issue needs to be addressed&amp;nbsp;as early as possible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: FLOOR LOAD NOT GENERATING CORRECTLY WITH GROUPING IN CONNECT EDITION, WHERE AS OLDER VERSION OF STAAD PRO V8I SS6 IS TAKING CORRECTLY</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/657586?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2021 06:25:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:d8713828-c7ea-4ce9-a1a7-603171c82f55</guid><dc:creator>Suvadeep Acharjee</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/ENQ212292_2D00_AMANA_2D00_3D_5F00_mod.STD"&gt;communities.bentley.com/.../ENQ212292_2D00_AMANA_2D00_3D_5F00_mod.STD&lt;/a&gt;The .std file attached when analyzed throws errors. To investigate model was modified (ENQ212292-AMANA-3D_mod.STD). There is a defect already posted w.r.t floor loads with one-way distribution having towards option (&lt;a class="caption" href="https://dev.azure.com/bentleycs/EngSim/_workitems/edit/487757"&gt;BUG 487757&lt;/a&gt;). Our development team is working to fix the issue while as a workaround you can apply the loading component for the floor load as a member load on the members.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>