<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>converting beam parts into single beam</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/21764/converting-beam-parts-into-single-beam</link><description>Hi everybody, I have been following this forum for sometime now and i find it very intresting and very informative. 
 I have a question regarding Staadpro. 
 How to mark a single beam (from column to column) instead of parts. I know about physical member</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: converting beam parts into single beam</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/398548?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 19:22:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b2368bda-d94a-4f22-abb0-c418daf73b66</guid><dc:creator>Sye</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Analytical member segments can only be part of a physical member if these are connected, collinear, have the same cross sectional properties, same material properties &amp;amp; also have the same local axis orientation. Are all of these conditions satisfied for your model? If so, and still the physical members are not being formed as desired, please upload your .std file and let us know one set of member numbers for which this is not working and we will look into it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: converting beam parts into single beam</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/398458?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 06:21:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a44fe572-0b77-40b1-9d5f-2d577d8e040b</guid><dc:creator>Parshva Shah</dc:creator><description>&lt;p style="margin-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/form-member-in-concrete-design.PNG"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/form-member-in-concrete-design.PNG"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/form-member-in-concrete-design.PNG"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hi Ktno&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have followed your steps but in this process all members are not connecting with each other. Please see attached image. I have tried by both manually and auto form but same things is happening. What can be possible solution in this case?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Parshva&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="margin-left:30px;"&gt;&lt;a href="/cfs-file/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/form-member-in-concrete-design.PNG"&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/940x0/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/form-member-in-concrete-design.PNG" width="708" height="508" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: converting beam parts into single beam</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/131815?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:08:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3247fae8-cc98-4960-8653-838f49768bc3</guid><dc:creator>ktno</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi. neepara,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a way to massive forming of members in Concrete Design Mode. You will need to prepare necessary preparations to do so. If You are ready, we have to go to &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1). Menu \Select \ By Section Property \ ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2). ToolBars \ Autoform Members ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this way you can form a lot of members within a short time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You have to prepare for having element orientations of the member to be in proper order.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for ... paying attension.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TNO&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: converting beam parts into single beam</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/128619?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 22:25:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b306b2bc-8a9f-4803-a2be-ec8b30957312</guid><dc:creator>Sye</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;To get displacements and shear/bending diagrams for the entire physical member you need to define physical members consisting of the analysis segments as indicated in one of the posts below. After you perform the analysis you can change your cursor to the physical member cursor and double click on the physical member and the query box should display the results for the physical member as a whole as opposed to the individual analysis segments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: converting beam parts into single beam</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/128436?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 23:40:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:e11d6f66-9f45-46ac-8125-dd00b95646a9</guid><dc:creator>Rharting</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This may be a general question, but i&amp;#39;m not sure I agree with the comment &amp;quot;limitations of such programs&amp;quot;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Staad you have all the information along the length of all of the beams (column to column) seperated into segments. Why doesn&amp;#39;t Staad simply combing each segment (similar to the physical member in steel design) and show you shear and moment diagrams along the full beam? This would provide a much more realistic way to check for modeling errors and verify designs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: converting beam parts into single beam</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/48904?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:12:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:27c891c8-1f6d-4b30-a060-c9d11865195b</guid><dc:creator>NIHESH.N</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;
I&amp;nbsp;would also&amp;nbsp;like to mention the following.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
STAAD is a mathematical modeling program. The problem you describe is one of the limitations of such programs which are meant for modeling general purpose structures. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A very simple way to get around this limitation is to specify the following sequence of commands
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
SELECT MEMBER list&lt;br /&gt;
GROUP MEMBER list&lt;br /&gt;
PERFORM ANALYSIS&lt;br /&gt;
CHECK CODE list
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This method is illustrated in Example 1 in the American Examples manual.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Alternatively, if the type of work you do is mostly building type, or has numerous physical members, you ought to look into programs like RAM Structural which are geared to handle physical members from the modeling phase through the final design phase
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: converting beam parts into single beam</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/48898?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:01:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:9ee011b9-6e53-4bb2-9020-7dd96e6119c3</guid><dc:creator>NIHESH.N</dc:creator><description>have you tried the auto form member option in the steel designer module? I believe that will reduce the time taken to form physical members to a&amp;nbsp;large extent.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><enclosure url="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/telligent-evolution-components-attachments/00-5932-01-00-00-04-88-98/auto-form-member.JPG" length="70852" type="image/jpeg" /></item><item><title>Re: converting beam parts into single beam</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/48892?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:49:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:2d0f1511-f448-4fe8-8f4e-d17d368391a1</guid><dc:creator>napeera</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;
THANKS FOR THE REPLY ATILO,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As I said Using Physical member is a tedious process, and also while designing it does not design as full beam as in ETABS.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;Any other suggestions.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
napeera 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: converting beam parts into single beam</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/48098?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:16:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:3017097e-f7e0-4d7b-bf1c-c48d914d47b0</guid><dc:creator>Atilio Andrade</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
You can form physical members while modeling&amp;nbsp;, or you can use the master slave option to simulate a slab and avoiding in this way to part the beam in multiple members. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://communities.bentley.com/photos/atilios_images/images/46191/488x375.aspx" border="0" /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>