<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>ram elements</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/218688/ram-elements</link><description>when i use the truss design module within ram elements i get results that seem reasonable. when i model the same truss in ram elements from scratch, the results are no where close. can the truss 
 modeled using the truss design module be opened in ram</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: ram elements</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/668587?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 23:05:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:b2b811c1-0ef6-40bc-b4c8-d4febf83ed6e</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, but there is a trick to it. Navigate to the folder where your truss model lives. There should be a second file with the same name, but with a .FEM extension. That&amp;#39;s the finite element model (meshed model) running behind the scenes. If you make a copy of that file, and rename the copy using the normal Ram Elements extension .retx, then you can open that file in Ram Elements natively.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Often&amp;nbsp;with truss design, bending in the chords due to continuity is the issue that leads to failure, where idealized truss design considering axial forces only, would be OK.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>