When generating a report of Utilization Ratios, some URs are displayed with more precision than other URs which causes the "Actual Ratio" column to appear to be an integer (see photo below). I cannot seem to determine a common thread for why some URs show higher precision as compared to others in the UR report. I initially thought it was a one-off report generation issue, but after restarting the program/re-running the analysis the same members display the additional digits (assuming there were no changes to the analysis model). Any way to rectify this issue?
Related question: Is there any way to customize the UR report (e.g., elect to hide certain columns)?
I am running STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition 22.01.00.38
Thank you!
Can you please share the STAAD file here? I can investigate and suggest some soluton.
Thanks Abhisek. I'd prefer to not post my model due to client confidentiality. As user shaymore has posted below, this issue has been identified in a service request back in February of this year. Is there a way I can follow the resolution of this item?