Hello All,
Can someone guide me how to remove above warning in STADD Pro, I have refereed to https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/30240/warnings-in-is800-2007, however can someone clarify below pointwise queries-
1) Why STADD is showing warnings for Truss members which are only subjected to Tension loads and Not bending moment, as this clause 9.3.2.2 is for combined bending and axial compression case. Should we neglect it for Truss Members or is it a bug in STADD Pro.
2) What should we do for member subjected to Bending and axial loads? For Example a certain X member is failing for Load case combination Y, then should we create different Load case combination similar to Y with REPEAT Load Case option and Analyze only failing Member X under this REPEAT Load case with Pdelta Analysis?
3) Is there any other way to eliminate this warning, by strengthening the Member or by any other means. Do advise.
Thanks.
I am sure you have understood the reason for this warning as mentioned in the linked post. Following are few clarifications --
Q1. It is not a bug. At this moment, this warning is reported for all types of member. During design, program does not consider the truss specification and design it as a general member with 0 bending forces. So though you have specified a member as truss member for which bending and interaction checks are not required, still program reports this warning. You can simply ignore this warning for truss member.
Q2. If this warning is reported for any member which is subjected to axial compression + bending, then as per cl.4.4.2, first order analysis + moment amplification method is not sufficient to consider the second order effects and you need to perform second order analysis. In such case, program does not terminate the design and you can still use the design results. But if you want to follow codal provisions, then you should change all load combinations to repeat load cases and perform second order analysis like pdelta analysis.
Q3. To remove these warnings, either you can perform second order analysis or use SET NOWARNING command which will instruct program not to print any warning in the output file. If you use this command, then you have to use the latest CONNECT Edition as there was a bug in the older version which has been fixed now.
If you look at the equation of Ky and Kz, you can notice this depends on non-dimensional effective slenderness ratio and ratio of applied compressive force/compression capacity. If you can increase the overall compression capacity of the member by increasing the r value or by reducing the euler buckling stress, then both lamdaY and ny value reduces which eventually decrease the ky/kz value. In other words, chance of buckling and second order effects reduce for a short stiff member rather than a ling slender section, correct?
Answer Verified By: Kamal Dhar
Hello Surojit,
Thankyou for your pointwise replies, that helped a lot in understanding.
Can you also help me below Message coming in STADD pro- ***NOTE: Static Seismic Analysis for IS1893 (Part-4): 2015 should be carried out with P-Delta Analysis as per 10.3
As per IS1893 P-delta analysis is required for all structural category in all zones. I tried adding Pdelta analysis in STADD model as per below syntax, could you please help me in verifying if I am using correct syntax/philosophy for Pdelta analysis for seismic case.
Kindly note that I have used SEISMIC definition in this case and called the same in Pure Seismic Load case along with Seismic loadings from different components mounted on Steel structure i.e Vessel/Piping etc. and added Pdelta analysis with Change Command at end. Kindly advise if below will provide accurate results.
STADD SYNTAX
DEFINE IS1893 2015 LOAD PART4ZONE 0.16 RF 4 I 1.5 SS 2 ST 2 DM 0.02FLOOR WEIGHTYRANGE 0 8 FLOAD 0.5 XRANGE 0 15 ZRANGE 0 10 GYMEMBER WEIGHT38 39 43 TO 46 49 52 53 56 57 60 TO 62 65 68 TO 72 76 TO 81 86 87 101 TO 106 -109 112 113 118 124 125 138 TO 140 152 154 TO 157 161 TO 164 167 182 186 -189 191 193 259 261 277 279 283 284 302 306 310 320 324 325 336 337 342 347 -364 369 370 373 375 397 399 402 UNI 0.25*324 UNI 0 0.25 0*68 UNI 0 0.25 0.95*68 UNI 0 0.25 0170 TO 172 175 CON 20.3191 192 195 196 CON 7.5203 204 207 208 CON 42.3275 276 281 282 CON 12.1FLOOR WEIGHTYRANGE 12 18 FLOAD 0.5 XRANGE 0 15 ZRANGE 0 10 GYYRANGE 12 13 FLOAD 0.5 XRANGE 1 3 ZRANGE 1 3.5 GYJOINT WEIGHT149 154 WEIGHT 0.9148 WEIGHT 1.8150 152 165 173 WEIGHT 2.4157 WEIGHT 1.35160 WEIGHT 13.15163 WEIGHT 11.1165 WEIGHT 0.2173 WEIGHT 1.75177 WEIGHT 1.12183 WEIGHT 5184 WEIGHT 37.3185 WEIGHT 0.1189 205 WEIGHT 1.05194 WEIGHT 11.05199 WEIGHT 0.1198 WEIGHT 8.3207 WEIGHT 32.45209 WEIGHT 26.85211 WEIGHT 13217 WEIGHT 0.5218 WEIGHT 0.1220 WEIGHT 0.4221 WEIGHT 0.1SELFWEIGHT 1.1 ************************LOAD 1 LOADTYPE Seismic TITLE SESIMIC LOAD (+X)1893 LOAD X 1MEMBER LOAD170 TO 172 175 CON GX 8.2175 CON GY -8.7172 CON GY 8.7191 192 195 196 CON GX 3196 CON GY -18.3195 CON GY 18.3275 276 281 282 CON GX 2.8282 CON GY -17.7281 CON GY 17.7203 204 207 208 CON GX 16.9208 CON GY -155.8207 CON GY 155.8JOINT LOAD149 154 FX 5.8148 FX 0.2150 152 165 173 FX 0.8157 FX 4.35160 FX 0.3163 FX 1165 FX 0.1173 FX 4.3177 FX 0.1183 FX 1.6184 FX 6.6185 FX 0.2189 205 FX 0.1194 FX 0.8199 FX 0.1198 FX 7.3207 FX 2.15209 FX 3.2211 FX 2.25217 FX 5.35218 FX 0.4220 FX 3.3221 FX 3.7PDELTA ANALYSIS SMALLDELTACHANGE