Hello All,
Can someone guide me how to remove above warning in STADD Pro, I have refereed to https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/30240/warnings-in-is800-2007, however can someone clarify below pointwise queries-
1) Why STADD is showing warnings for Truss members which are only subjected to Tension loads and Not bending moment, as this clause 9.3.2.2 is for combined bending and axial compression case. Should we neglect it for Truss Members or is it a bug in STADD Pro.
2) What should we do for member subjected to Bending and axial loads? For Example a certain X member is failing for Load case combination Y, then should we create different Load case combination similar to Y with REPEAT Load Case option and Analyze only failing Member X under this REPEAT Load case with Pdelta Analysis?
3) Is there any other way to eliminate this warning, by strengthening the Member or by any other means. Do advise.
Thanks.
1. In amendment no. 1 (January 2012), cl.4.4.2 has been modified and moment amplification factor is denoted as Ky, Kz, not Cy,Cz. You can check that for more details. Also, this Ky,Kz is not same as effective length parameter, it is calculated as per cl.9.3.2.2. 2. Currently, STAAD designs all member as general member considering correct design force, which mean, for all member including truss, capacity at relevant sections are calculated and that is compared against the actual design force. So irrespective of any member specification, this warning is reported.
Check this post for more details -- communities.bentley.com/.../warnings-in-is800-2007
View online
You received this notification because you subscribed to the forum. To unsubscribe from only this thread, go here.
Flag this post as spam/abuse.
1. In amendment no. 1 (January 2012), cl.4.4.2 has been modified and moment amplification factor is denoted as Ky, Kz, not Cy,Cz. You can check that for more details. Also, this Ky,Kz is not same as effective length parameter, it is calculated as per cl.9.3.2.2.2. Currently, STAAD designs all member as general member considering correct design force, which mean, for all member including truss, capacity at relevant sections are calculated and that is compared against the actual design force. So irrespective of any member specification, this warning is reported.
Hello, Surojit,
On this warning, I have other two questions:
1) As per SECTION 4.4.2 & 4.4.3 of IS800-2007 , MOMENT AMPLIFICATION FACTORS is defined as Cy Cz or Cmy Cmz; While in the program warning, MOMENT AMPLIFICATION FACTORS are marked as KY OR KZ? As We know, KX KY or KZ is effective length of members in STAAD. So which are MOMENT AMPLIFICATION FACTORS, Cmy & Cmz or KY & KZ?
2)As per SECTION 4.4.2 & 4.4.3 &Table 18 of IS800-2007, for members with moment released at both ends (eg. truss member), How does the THE VALUE OF MOMENT AMPLIFICATION FACTORS Cmy or Cmz obtained from Table 18 is greater than1.4?
Thanks for your prompt reply!
Hello Surojit, can you reply to above query of mine. That will be helpful.
Thankyou in advance.
Hello Surojit,
Thankyou for your pointwise replies, that helped a lot in understanding.
Can you also help me below Message coming in STADD pro- ***NOTE: Static Seismic Analysis for IS1893 (Part-4): 2015 should be carried out with P-Delta Analysis as per 10.3
As per IS1893 P-delta analysis is required for all structural category in all zones. I tried adding Pdelta analysis in STADD model as per below syntax, could you please help me in verifying if I am using correct syntax/philosophy for Pdelta analysis for seismic case.
Kindly note that I have used SEISMIC definition in this case and called the same in Pure Seismic Load case along with Seismic loadings from different components mounted on Steel structure i.e Vessel/Piping etc. and added Pdelta analysis with Change Command at end. Kindly advise if below will provide accurate results.
STADD SYNTAX
DEFINE IS1893 2015 LOAD PART4ZONE 0.16 RF 4 I 1.5 SS 2 ST 2 DM 0.02FLOOR WEIGHTYRANGE 0 8 FLOAD 0.5 XRANGE 0 15 ZRANGE 0 10 GYMEMBER WEIGHT38 39 43 TO 46 49 52 53 56 57 60 TO 62 65 68 TO 72 76 TO 81 86 87 101 TO 106 -109 112 113 118 124 125 138 TO 140 152 154 TO 157 161 TO 164 167 182 186 -189 191 193 259 261 277 279 283 284 302 306 310 320 324 325 336 337 342 347 -364 369 370 373 375 397 399 402 UNI 0.25*324 UNI 0 0.25 0*68 UNI 0 0.25 0.95*68 UNI 0 0.25 0170 TO 172 175 CON 20.3191 192 195 196 CON 7.5203 204 207 208 CON 42.3275 276 281 282 CON 12.1FLOOR WEIGHTYRANGE 12 18 FLOAD 0.5 XRANGE 0 15 ZRANGE 0 10 GYYRANGE 12 13 FLOAD 0.5 XRANGE 1 3 ZRANGE 1 3.5 GYJOINT WEIGHT149 154 WEIGHT 0.9148 WEIGHT 1.8150 152 165 173 WEIGHT 2.4157 WEIGHT 1.35160 WEIGHT 13.15163 WEIGHT 11.1165 WEIGHT 0.2173 WEIGHT 1.75177 WEIGHT 1.12183 WEIGHT 5184 WEIGHT 37.3185 WEIGHT 0.1189 205 WEIGHT 1.05194 WEIGHT 11.05199 WEIGHT 0.1198 WEIGHT 8.3207 WEIGHT 32.45209 WEIGHT 26.85211 WEIGHT 13217 WEIGHT 0.5218 WEIGHT 0.1220 WEIGHT 0.4221 WEIGHT 0.1SELFWEIGHT 1.1 ************************LOAD 1 LOADTYPE Seismic TITLE SESIMIC LOAD (+X)1893 LOAD X 1MEMBER LOAD170 TO 172 175 CON GX 8.2175 CON GY -8.7172 CON GY 8.7191 192 195 196 CON GX 3196 CON GY -18.3195 CON GY 18.3275 276 281 282 CON GX 2.8282 CON GY -17.7281 CON GY 17.7203 204 207 208 CON GX 16.9208 CON GY -155.8207 CON GY 155.8JOINT LOAD149 154 FX 5.8148 FX 0.2150 152 165 173 FX 0.8157 FX 4.35160 FX 0.3163 FX 1165 FX 0.1173 FX 4.3177 FX 0.1183 FX 1.6184 FX 6.6185 FX 0.2189 205 FX 0.1194 FX 0.8199 FX 0.1198 FX 7.3207 FX 2.15209 FX 3.2211 FX 2.25217 FX 5.35218 FX 0.4220 FX 3.3221 FX 3.7PDELTA ANALYSIS SMALLDELTACHANGE