<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Clarification: Per the Example Calculating Semirigid Diaphragm E&amp;#39;</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/221488/clarification-per-the-example-calculating-semirigid-diaphragm-e</link><description>The resulting E&amp;#39; is in the units of ksi, but it is coupled to the thickness of the gauged deck in the first place. So when inputting the equivalent thickness into RAM, should it be 1&amp;quot; thick, or should it be the thickness of the deck that is assumed in</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Clarification: Per the Example Calculating Semirigid Diaphragm E'</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/679833?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 16:58:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:400cc99f-2573-4ac3-afaa-b07272456aff</guid><dc:creator>Tiberiu Polocoser</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Understood, thank you Seth. To reiterate, the E&amp;#39; that is calculated using this approach means to enter in the same plate thickness as the gauge thickness, but because this doesn&amp;#39;t capture the out-of-plane stiffness that is present from the deck geometry you are saying to arbitrarily proportion components in the product t*E&amp;#39; to adjust for this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, the equation for the G is given in the example. By not giving the option to enter it you are making sure it is not inadvertently defined twice, also meaning isotropic properties. This is fine, just good for me to know.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Clarification: Per the Example Calculating Semirigid Diaphragm E'</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/679832?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2021 16:43:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:92c426cd-be33-42c1-9541-c36317432483</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;For in plane stiffness what matters is E&amp;#39; and t (the product of the two). I often advise people to make the thickness more than the gage, while reducing E&amp;#39;, so that the out of plane stiffness is greater (since this is related to t^3). You don&amp;#39;t enter G directly, but it&amp;#39;s obtained from Hooke&amp;#39;s law give E and Poisson&amp;#39;s ratio.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>