<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Live load reduction parameter</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/227873/live-load-reduction-parameter</link><description>Ram Concept allows users to select the code for live load reduction. I selected IBC 2018. The slab longitudinal and latitude strip trib areas were approx. 400 sq ft. each. Based on live load reduction formula, since the trib area times Kll factor was</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Live load reduction parameter</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/704621?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 17:52:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:bc764ab6-5489-456c-995b-009ed95d2800</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Correct, only the first method (1607.11.1) is implemented.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note, you can separately control the punching shear LLr parameters if it helps you to run a single model only.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Live load reduction parameter</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/704619?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 17:44:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:bf82c6f0-3c93-45eb-bdf4-b2c47ea111b2</guid><dc:creator>Chinmay Damle</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Seth! I did end up applying reduced live load for slab flexure results and had a separate model for punching check. Is it safe to assume that Ram Concept only uses the standard Live Load reduction formula (from ASCE and IBC) and does not use the alternate live load reduction even when we specify IBC as the code for live load reduction?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Live load reduction parameter</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/704618?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 17:34:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:08a573ef-04be-45a8-b04e-701e5c220d87</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The manual confirms what you are seeing:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/5932/pastedimage1648834560631v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You could force the issue by specifying the Trib. area and Influence area directly (and maybe a max reduction %), or you could apply pre-reduced live loads only. You might check if any of the other codes use a method that equates to the IBC Alternate method, I never took it that far myself.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>