<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://communities.bentley.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Assign steel beam connection types in the model for the Connection Check.</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/products/ram-staad/f/ram-staad-forum/228414/assign-steel-beam-connection-types-in-the-model-for-the-connection-check</link><description>I would like to bring up a question and maybe a discussion about the way RAM treats beam-beam and beam-column connections. The RAM &amp;quot;Connection Check&amp;quot; feature will check the connection capacity vs demand purely from a beam size perspective, not taking</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 12</generator><item><title>RE: Assign steel beam connection types in the model for the Connection Check.</title><link>https://communities.bentley.com/thread/706563?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2022 22:31:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6dad98f5-dbc9-4c4d-a9ba-e9da8dc6aa8e:a10d334d-c36f-43c2-a3fb-a433e97095b7</guid><dc:creator>Seth Guthrie</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You can use the framing check report to get a separate report of beam to girder connections where the girder depth is less than the beam depth, because those are bound to require a deep cope, but that&amp;#39;s the closest thing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You could also design the connections in Ram Connection.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>